2026
@Soumava2002 Can you help here? XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:09, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Soman@Toddy1 You are requested to add your valuable contributions to the draft. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi. Overall, the draft is good. The hurdle for moving it to mainspace is that for editors without prior knowledge that organisations like SFI and CITU involves millions of people, most of it seems internal. The Manorama article is good as indicator of notability (independent and notable media outlet, article where she is the main focus). Try to get 2 more references like that, and move to mainspace. --Soman (talk) 11:52, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Soman I have added citations from Onmanorama, Anandabazar and other sources too. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, Anandabazar Patrik is good as well, but it isn't very in-depth. Manorama and Onmanorama are basically same outlet in 2 languages. Is there any potential reference with more bio data, more indepth coverage? --Soman (talk) 11:57, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Soman The source of Theory and Praxis? It has many items of information. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:58, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, Anandabazar Patrik is good as well, but it isn't very in-depth. Manorama and Onmanorama are basically same outlet in 2 languages. Is there any potential reference with more bio data, more indepth coverage? --Soman (talk) 11:57, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Soman I have added citations from Onmanorama, Anandabazar and other sources too. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi. Overall, the draft is good. The hurdle for moving it to mainspace is that for editors without prior knowledge that organisations like SFI and CITU involves millions of people, most of it seems internal. The Manorama article is good as indicator of notability (independent and notable media outlet, article where she is the main focus). Try to get 2 more references like that, and move to mainspace. --Soman (talk) 11:52, 14 June 2026 (UTC)