Hello,
The last discussion on deletion Sorin Cerin article, took place sixteen years ago, in 2006. The last time Sorin Cerin article was deleted was fifteen years ago, in 2007. All sources or books in this Sorin Cerin draft have been released and printed after the last deletion from May, 2007, so this draft has a completely new content compared to the article deleted in 2006 or 2007 by the administrators listed above in the draft. In conclusion, all the information included in this draft appeared long after Sorin Cerin article was deleted, which means that nothing from the old article, deleted in 2007, is in this draft. I would like to have your opinion on the article from draft Thanks in advance.Bineart (talk) 19:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Bineart I'm sure that's true. On the other hand, I've seen insights by administrators who not only can access deleted articles (not being an administrator, I can't), but also know more information about the history of the article than I do. Unless you're being dishonest about how different the draft is from the previous article (doubt it, you seem honest), I doubt anything will come of the notifications I've added to the draft. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I checked the sources again. No source representing a recognized specialist in the field of literature or philosophy, who writes in a prestigious publication, existed until May 2007 and after that for a long time. For an article to be encyclopedic, there must be recognized specialists who recognize the work in that article. For example, Sorin Cerin wrote several books before May 2007. These are novels. But because there are no reliable independent sources about these novels to prove that Sorin Cerin is recognized as a novelist, that his novels are truly encyclopedic, I did not put them in the draft at all. In the draft I passed only the works recognized by reliable independent sources, ie by specialists recognized in the respective field who wrote in specialized publications about the works of Sorin Cerin. In vain would the book Coaxialism have appeared in the article deleted in 2007 if there were no serious and independent reliable sources about this book to write about that book. Instead, I introduced the book Coaxialism to the draft because at a certain point in time, after May 2007, there were specialists who wrote about Coaxialism. I'm not talking about books from the work of wisdom or poetry, recognized by specialists in prestigious publications, which at that time, in May 2007, had not even appeared.Thank you again for the answer.Bineart (talk) 06:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)