File:Schneemann-Interior Scroll.gif

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Summary

Carolee Schneemann performing Interior Scroll Photo by Anthony McCall

Fair use
true

This photo illustrates a specific piece of performance art that occurred in 1975. Thus it is not reproduceable. No freely-licensed images are available of this event. This image serves to portray both the artist in question and a very important piece of art in Fluxus, feminism, and performance art. Thus, I claim this image as fair use in good faith. Wickethewok 03:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Licensing

Fair use rationale in Carolee Schneemann:

  1. This is a historically significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  3. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  4. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work and would be unlikely to impact sales of prints or be usable as a desktop backdrop.

Fair use rationale in Postmodern art:

  1. This is a historically significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  3. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  4. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work and would be unlikely to impact sales of prints or be usable as a desktop backdrop.

Fair use rationale in Late modernism:

  1. This is a historically significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  3. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  4. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work and would be unlikely to impact sales of prints or be usable as a desktop backdrop.

Fair use rationale in Performance art:

  1. This is a historically significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
  2. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
  3. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
  4. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work and would be unlikely to impact sales of prints or be usable as a desktop backdrop.