Talk:Bottle Episode (The Simpsons)/GA1

Comments

• Archive refs 4 and 6.
• "They ultimately lost to" Is "ultimately" really that necessary? Could it go smth like "For their script for "Bottle Episode", Rob and Johnny LaZebnik were nominated for the Award for Television Animation at the 77th Writers Guild of America Awards, but lost to the Bob's Burgers episode "Saving Favorite Drive-In"."?

Surprisingly, that's all I got.

Table

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Passes.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Passes.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Passes.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Passes.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Source spot-check is all good; passes.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Earwig shows 2.9% similarity, which is super impressive; passes.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Passes.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Passes.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Neutrality is all good; passes.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Page history shows no recent edit wars; passes.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Both images have properly tagged and have valid rationales; passes.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Both images are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions; passes.
	7. Overall assessment.	All else good, passing now.

Source spot-check

This table lists 1 random passages from throughout the article (6.3% of 16 total passages). These passages contain 1 inline citations (5.9% of 17 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. RedShellMomentum 00:46, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Reference #	Letter	Source	Archive	Status	Notes
Regarding the strangulation joke, Cathal Gunning, another ScreenRant writer, criticized it for bringing back a gag he felt had already grown tired, and making it "worse". Gunning noted that the joke had a meta tone to it, possibly being used by the writers as a way to showcase how the gag was "controversial" at this point, but also feel "mean-spirited", as the season had seldom used Bart by this episode, and still went out of it's way to call Bart's strangulation one of his defining traits.
13		screenrant.com	web.archive.org