Talk:Gay Nigger Association of America

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Site

There's a GNAA site now called gnaa.africa, we sure it's affiliated with them? gnaa.eu is empty 182.253.246.99 (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

No one mentioned Nigger.net

Nigger.net is a appreciation tag when searched brings up a single line of text i found it years back randomly when messing with a few friends in high school. 2601:18B:301:1B80:15BE:B828:19FC:C186 (talk) 22:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2025

I am actually a part of the GNAA, i feel incredibly disrespected, especially around the part where you call my association a trolling group! I would really want to add some useful info to this site, so you guys can actually write some real history! Magnus Lundberg (talk) 08:28, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 12:36, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Requested move 20 February 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. WP:SNOW closure. (non-admin closure) Jessintime (talk) 04:54, 22 February 2026 (UTC)


Gay Nigger Association of AmericaGay Black Association of America – The title is offensive. We need to get that racial slur out of the title. Ligo (talk) 12:57, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Oppose: Wikipedia is not censored, and this is the common name of the group. 1isall (talk | contribs) 13:31, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose: As mentioned above, Wikipedia is not censored. No matter how offensive, this is the common name of the group, even if it includes a slur. The omission of the slur in the title and in the text of article would cause the article to be less informative - there is no viable alternative. Offensive material in articles is allowed provided it's done for a good reason, as it is in this case. veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 14:21, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose per COMMONNAME.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:05, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose per all the above. Probably worth a WP:SNOWCLOSE. Tevildo (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose move and snowclose. We've been over this before. Just because the title is offensive doesn't mean it should be changed on this wiki. O.N.R. (talk) 01:17, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.