GA review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: GiftedIceCream (talk · contribs) 14:42, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 21:33, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
I wanted to review the article since it's a retired hurricane article. There are some pretty major issues I noticed right off the bat.
- The lack of an aftermath section.
- The impact seems light on detail for a retired storm
- The MH should have a sub-section on naming trivia, including the part about Otto and the naming policy parts.
- - here is ReliefWeb with a bunch of reports, including foreign donations, relief operations, and more impact. For example, 3,874 homes damaged/destroyed in Costa Rica, far higher than what's in the article.
- Can you find a URL to cover the info in ref 22 and 23?
- The first paragraph of the lead is long, can you split it?
I can review the article more if you'd like, but the lack of aftermath and all the missing info seems pretty crucial. Lemme know what you think, I'll give the standard seven days to address the issues. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:33, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink, correct me if I'm wrong but per WP:GANI#R2, a user cannot review an article to which they significantly contributed. Per XTools, you are ranked 1st on authorship, having contributed to 39% of the article. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 17:23, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Aviationwikiflight: I completely forgot about that, and that's fair. @GiftedIceCream: consider this more of a suggestion then to withdraw and continue working on the article, since I don't believe the article is close to GA status, but of course I could be biased. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2026 (UTC)