GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 22:07, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Min968 (talk · contribs) 04:55, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
Regarding the prose, I don't see any major issues. However, I'm curious about what kind of transcription čeu-tau-ši and liušu are. Can they be removed or converted to Pinyin? Additionally, do we know whether Atwood (2026) and Martin (1970) have ISBNs?
- Hi Min968, neither have ISBNs—the edition of Martin used was released before they were a worldwide standard, and Atwood's will receive one later this year (I'm using an advance copy). I presume the highlighted transcriptions are of Jurchen words, but I don't know specifics and am not inclined to remove them unless really necessary. I can ask Dr Atwood if you prefer? Thanks, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29 Thank you. That answer is enough for me. The source review has been completed and passed based on my check. It is now passed. Min968 (talk) 18:39, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.