Talk:List of Lufthansa destinations

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for your work on this article. Please fix the error in footnote 28. Thanks and have a great day!

Mariamnei (talk) 09:51, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Actually, at looking at this further, I see that the article was previously deleted as per this discussion, and I don't see any improvements here, so I will be nominating it for deletion again. Have a great day!

Mariamnei (talk) 09:54, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Redirection

@Rosbif73 - You've suggested a redirection discussion here. From my POV the appropriate target is the airline page. FOARP (talk) 11:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

100% agreed that this should be WP:BLARed to Lufthansa#Destinations. Noting for the record that redirecting is an editorial action and does not require an AFD per the discussion here. Rosbif73 (talk) 11:42, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
I oppose the redirect, Lufthansa is the second largest European airline and its destinations have enough coverage to justify a separate page. Kelob2678 (talk) 18:00, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Looks like two editors in agreement here. FOARP (talk) 09:01, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
And one is against, which means we have no consensus to redirect. Kelob2678 (talk) 09:03, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Pinging the other participants in the recent AfD: Mariamnei, Nf utvol, Keivan.f, Iljhgtn, Katzrockso, S5A-0043, and Pppery. Rosbif73 (talk) 09:30, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
I also oppose a redirect. The correct forum for a contested BLAR is AfD. Relitigating this outcome so soon after the AfD could be construed as disruptive. Katzrockso (talk) 11:32, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
We've just been told we can't discuss this at AFD and that the talk page is the appropriate forum, so this seems like a Catch-22. FOARP (talk) 12:45, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Who told you you can't discuss BLAR at AfD? WP:ATD-R states If the change is disputed, such as by reversion, an attempt should be made to reach a consensus before blank-and-redirecting again. The preferred venue for doing so is the appropriate deletion discussion venue for the pre-redirect content, although sometimes the dispute may be resolved on the page's talk page.
I disagree that the talk page would be suitable here, as it has a smaller reach than AfD.
Given that the AfD closed as no consensus, I would suggest waiting and then WP:RENOM to see if consensus will change. Immediately attempting to implement a result (redirection) that just achieved no consensus at AfD is counterproductive Katzrockso (talk) 17:43, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
The issue raised by @FOARP on the AfD closer's talk page is essentially that if the delete !voters were largely happy with redirecting as an WP:ATD then there probably would have been consensus. Hence the opportunity for them (or others) to weigh in here. Rosbif73 (talk) 08:09, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
I don't agree that if the delete votes are read as redirects, there is a consensus for redirection. I think that a relist would have been necessary in this case. Katzrockso (talk) 13:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
I second this comment on WP:RENOM. Plus, according to the initial nomination statement and several subsequent comments prior to the close and reopening, the reason for their votes can be summarised as recreation of a deleted article, or WP:G4, which has been overturned by consensus in a DRV. Even if we consider these votes as redirects, the reasoning is not well substantiated with other criterion (notability etc). I also do not see a lot of engagement to the sources in my comment regarding WP:NLIST; one should consider addressing these if they wish to push on with redirecting. S5A-0043🚎(Talk) 08:32, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
I think a redirect makes the most sense. Mariamnei (talk) 07:32, 13 March 2026 (UTC)