Talk:Mollie Lambert (actress)/GA1

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 10:16, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: RandFreeman (talk · contribs) 04:16, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

My review should be up by this week's end (04:00, 23 June UTC). Rand Freeman talk ⬩ in solidarity 04:16, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:21, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Not seeing any issues with the prose, layout, lead section, formatting or neutrality. Criteria 6a and 6b are irrelevant, since copyrighted images of living people are almost never eligible for fair use and, as far as I have looked, there are no freely licensed images of Lambert. Because you are the only substantial contributor, the article is stable. Rand Freeman talk ⬩ in solidarity 22:48, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

The references are formatted reasonably, and all information needed for a reader to determine a source's provenance is included when the source gives it. The subject is obscure but the article covers her in fair depth. Sourcing evaluation and spot checks coming soon. Rand Freeman talk ⬩ in solidarity 03:40, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
I have fixed the minor CLOP I noted in my spotcheck and don't see any outstanding problems, so I will pass. Rand Freeman talk ⬩ in solidarity 16:32, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
Spot checks

Citation numbers as of this revision. Rand Freeman talk ⬩ in solidarity 05:00, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

  • 2: OK
  • 3: mostly fine, but "as part of Peri Lomax's ... homelessness storyline" is almost verbatim from the source Reworded myself.
  • 6: OK
  • 9: OK
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.