Requested move 19 June 2026
Zubák → Zubák, Púchov District – No indication that the entry delineating the village [population 810] is primary over Zubak (surname). Both should be listed upon a Zubak [no diacritic] disambiguation page with a "See also" listing Zubac. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:59, 19 June 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. ⹃Maltazarian ᚾparley
∨
{\displaystyle \lor }
- Comment, is the accent enough for SMALLDIFFERENCES? Maybe a dab should be created at Zubak.--Ortizesp (talk) 00:11, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
- On the other hand, If consensus were to prefer that the entry for Zubák village remain as is and Zubak (surname) is moved to Zubak, with a hatnote atop the surname entry pointing to the village, I would not oppose such an alternative option. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:19, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose the original proposal and suuport Ortizesp. Zubak should be converted into a dab page. FromCzech (talk) 15:16, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
- Move to Zubák, Slovakia (only one there, so no need to be more specific) and move Zubak (surname) to Zubak and convert to dabpage. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:37, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Only one here, and primary topic compared to the uncommon surname Zubák, so no disambiguator is needed. The diacritics is sufficient and the hatnote with the surname is already there. FromCzech (talk) 07:37, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- I don't agree that the diacritic is sufficient disambiguation or that this small place is primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- I don't say that is is primary topic compared to Zubak (where I support the conversion from redirect to Zubák to the dab page), I say it is the primary topic within Zubák with diacritics. FromCzech (talk) 16:41, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- But we have generally held that a diacritic is not enough to disambiguate. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- This doesn't make sense. If there is only one page with diacritics and the user intentionally types the diacritics in to get to the page they are looking for, why should we send them to the dab page? FromCzech (talk) 16:57, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- Who on earth is going to do that?! -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:45, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- This doesn't make sense. If there is only one page with diacritics and the user intentionally types the diacritics in to get to the page they are looking for, why should we send them to the dab page? FromCzech (talk) 16:57, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- But we have generally held that a diacritic is not enough to disambiguate. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- I don't say that is is primary topic compared to Zubak (where I support the conversion from redirect to Zubák to the dab page), I say it is the primary topic within Zubák with diacritics. FromCzech (talk) 16:41, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- I don't agree that the diacritic is sufficient disambiguation or that this small place is primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- Only one here, and primary topic compared to the uncommon surname Zubák, so no disambiguator is needed. The diacritics is sufficient and the hatnote with the surname is already there. FromCzech (talk) 07:37, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:SMALLDETAILS but convert Zubak into a DAB, per SMALLDETAILS anyone typing the diacritic could only be looking for the place. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:13, 28 June 2026 (UTC)