User talk:Veko/Archives/2026/February

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Hey, I am currently away


Change my status (purge)

User Homepage
User Homepage
Biography
Biography
Talk
Talk
Journal
Journal
Vandalism
Vandalism
Other
Other

January–February 2026 NPP drive - Phase 2

NPP unreviewed article statistics as of February 02, 2026

Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!

You are receiving this message because you added your name to the participants list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-06

MediaWiki message delivery 17:42, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Twistedmath and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 2

MediaWiki message delivery 02:05, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Twistedmath and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Tech News: 2026-07

MediaWiki message delivery 23:29, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Twistedmath and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Arbitration

  • Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-08

MediaWiki message delivery 19:15, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Twistedmath and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

The Signpost: 17 February 2026

  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?

(This message was sent to User talk:Twistedmath and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 3

MediaWiki message delivery 23:26, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Twistedmath and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Question from JoseAlfonso-1994 (15:16, 18 February 2026)

Ayuda para las locencias de derechos de autor y seguridad --JoseAlfonso-1994 (talk) 15:16, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-09

MediaWiki message delivery 19:02, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Twistedmath and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Question from Edcz (01:08, 24 February 2026)

Hi Veko, hope all is well. Are news sources and university journals accepted for citations? --Edcz (talk) 01:08, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

eye I have read the above message. I will reply when I have a moment. veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 15:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Please revert your close and relist at Talk:Population

This is a discussion of sufficient importance that it should not be closed by a non-admin. Please revert and relist so that the discussion can continue and receive a proper admin closure. BD2412 T 15:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm unsure why the 'importance' of an RM should determine whether a page mover or an administrator closes it. Several a move requests have been moved by non administrators, on quite significant pages. Nevertheless, I've reverted the closure per your contest. veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 15:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
While non-admins should be cautious (as indeed all move closers should be) when closing discussions where significant contentious debate among participants is unresolved, any experienced and uninvolved editor in good standing may close any RM debate. veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 15:25, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting and relisting. Apologies if my request was brusque. I do not mean to imply that your close was in violation of any rule, but that for a topic as fundamental as population, the outcome of the discussion is best left to an admin to resolve. It was also my immediate impression that even though the discussion seems to have stopped, the unresolved issues could potentially be resolved through a relisting. BD2412 T 15:36, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
I see, thank you for clarifying. veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 15:42, 26 February 2026 (UTC)