User talk:Vinant138

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Adam Tucker (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thatguy1987 (talk) 17:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Vinant138! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thatguy1987 (talk) 17:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Adam Tucker (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources like IMDB, Youtube and podcasts shouldn't be used.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 00:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Adam Tucker has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Adam Tucker. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 18:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Adam Tucker (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Interviews do not normally count as 'independent', blogs and fan sites do not count as 'reliable'. He seems to have been a busy actor, but not in major roles. Has he been in any major film or TV roles?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sionk (talk) 17:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:James Adam Tucker

Hello, Vinant138. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James Adam Tucker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 00:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)