User talk:Zia SAD

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Gladwin (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 06:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Zia SAD! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 06:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Gladwin (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lil-unique1 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article needs reformatting to meet encyclopaedic standards. For example, remove non-necessary capitalisations per MOS:CAPS, make sure all material is supported by non-primary sources and better coverage that explains beyond the director's work.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 23:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Zia SAD! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Submission being declined, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Gladwin (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Article still has formatting and prose issues which mean it is not written in an encyclopedic style. Refer to MOS:CAPS, swap the order of the lists to match other articles (oldest > newest instead of vice versa), and ensure that the article is backed up by sources which demonstrate the independent notability of Gladwin, not just as part of Back to Back.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Turnagra (talk) 08:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Gladwin (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JML1148 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Insufficient changes since last decline.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 07:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bruce Gladwin

Information icon Hello, Zia SAD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bruce Gladwin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bruce Gladwin

Hello, Zia SAD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bruce Gladwin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 21 May 2025 (UTC)