Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1904 Massevitch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. MBisanz ^talk 03:04, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

1904 Massevitch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG; delete and redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Redirect per WP:DWMP: it does receive brief mention in a few scholarly articles, but the content is insufficient to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Weak keep as having an unusual combination of characteristics (V-type but located in the outer main belt) —David Eppstein (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 — appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NASTRO. --slakr^\ talk / 19:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.