- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:10, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
21Shares
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 21Shares (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Typical crypto-spam. I don't think this 7-year-old finance company even approaches notability. They've received some funding and offer some products, wow. Author blocked as a sock. MediaKyle (talk) 11:47, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Finance, Companies, and Switzerland. MediaKyle (talk) 11:47, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete- not finding enough SIGCOV sources to suggest notability, even with additional searches, getting a lot of primary sources on the search hits as well.Lorraine Crane (talk) 01:58, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.