Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Palkhed

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as a soft deletion. Editors can request the article's undeletion for any reason. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 21:51, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Battle of Palkhed

Battle of Palkhed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources do not appear to be covering this battle in detail, there are passing mentions and the article on Treaty of Mungi-Shevgaon exists, so this article is redundant and content can be covered there instead. Zalaraz (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

  • One would expect the "Battle of Plakhed" to describe a battle. This is as close as the article gets, "The Nizam was cornered in a waterless tract near Palkhed on 25 February 1728." Editors discussed this on the talk page. It doesn't seem so much a battle as a site of surrender. Deleting this article would be a good start. If it is to remain, it needs a great deal of work, and probably a new title. Trumpetrep (talk) 01:55, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Deletion would be a good start but I am also fine without any recreation. Accesscrawl (talk) 02:04, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.