Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becky Want

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:42, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Becky Want

Becky Want (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No clear established notability; minimal secondary RS coverage. TurquoiseGoose (talk) 22:18, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Hesitant about AfD. The article may have a plausible claim to notability through the long broadcasting career, including BBC and regional broadcasting work, so a fuller WP:BLP search seems best before deletion.
However, to OPs point, the article clearly needs WP:RS cleanup. Poorly sourced personal details, especially date of birth and family information, should be removed unless supported by strong reliable sources (in addition to independent secondary sources). If those sources cannot be found after cleanup, then AfD or redirect/merge (BBC Radio Manchester) may be appropriate. ABehjat (talk) 01:39, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
We cannot argue that "There must be sources somewhere!" -The Gnome (talk) 09:44, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep: A regular national broadcaster seen as notable enough for an article on Wikipedia as she has presented an England-wide radio show for the past four years and presents items for a well-known and established UK-wide programme.Rillington (talk) 15:02, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Circular argument: Subject merits an article in Wikipedia because she has an article in Wikipedia. Also, "I simply find her notable"! -The Gnome (talk) 09:44, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:55, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 17:06, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
The citations are still interviews; just more interviews (cross-interviewing is not all atypical in the journalistic milieu). We cannot build something from adding up nothings. -The Gnome (talk) 06:04, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep per Beccaynr. Those are profiles, which count towards notability, not Q&As, which don't. Also: a mention in ; stalking case ; mention in ; report on her BBC Radio Manchester show ; ; her engagement and wedding . This is all sufficient to satisfy GNG. Fences&Windows 13:01, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak keep based on what's available and as discussed above. I always prefer that articles found be added before closing an AfD discussion. Bearian (talk) 21:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.