- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione Message 11:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Behar Merlaku
- Behar Merlaku (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Person is notable for a single event (appearing to win a massive casino jackpot, then having the winnings taken away due to a software error). This is classic WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS. Merlaku is almost certainly not going to have lasting notability; if something changes a year from now, and he transforms this event into lasting fame, then we can have the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: Maybe in a year from now the Great Behar Merlaku Scandal will have shaken the casino world to its core, but somehow I doubt it. As it stands, he's basically just a guy who's showed up in a fluff news article on HuffPo etc. Delete, delete, delete. --Lost tiree, lost dutch :O (talk) 02:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: In a year or so everyone will have forgotten about him. ~Excesses~ (talk) 13:09, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: Known for only one event. SL93 (talk) 22:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Classic "one event". --Legis (talk - contribs) 03:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.