- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
CPD -572874
- CPD -572874 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I found a few references, which I have added, and it was the first star of that class that particular features where observed in. I think there is enough there now to prove notability. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per sources found by Sarahj2107.-- cyclopiaspeak! 12:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:HEY (and WP:NASTRO #3). —David Eppstein (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Notability has now been shown. SL93 (talk) 18:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.