Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Drees

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:31, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Claudia Drees

Claudia Drees (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Based on all available material, an averagely-productive mid-career academic with no GNG coverage and no special honours / awards / WP:PROF-worthy special recognition. I don't see the case for an article here. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:00, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Biology, and Germany. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:07, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: Nothing in Gscholar for a person in Germany, someone in the UK has a citation list of about 1600, I'm not sure if they're the same person. Doesn't seem to pass PROF based on the limited sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 13:51, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
    Her most recent publication lists both her old affiliation in Hamburg (matching our article) and the new one in Sussex, as does her Sussex staff profile. Definitely the same person. Google Scholar profile: . —David Eppstein (talk) 07:32, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'm seeing three-digit citation counts only for two papers in which she is in a middle position among many authors, not enough to convince me of WP:PROF#C1, and her associate professor position at Sussex is definitely not enough for #C5. Nothing in the article suggests any other form of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:36, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.