No article found for “Abdullah Al-Shalawi?action=edit&redlink=1”.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideal final result

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to TRIZ. Black Kite (talk) 17:05, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Ideal final result

Ideal final result (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable concept aprock (talk) 07:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

  • redirect to TRIZ which is the only place it has some significance. Mangoe (talk) 12:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep It's a notable topic as there's at least one book on the topic: The Ideal Result. Andrew (talk) 18:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
The blurb says that "The Ideal Final Result introduces the TRIZ Inventive Problem Solving Process", so it's a book on the latter, not the former. Mangoe (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
The book focusses on this particular aspect of TRIZ. This title seems better for our purpose in that it is comparatively plain English. Per WP:RECOGNIZABLE, we should prefer it to the obscure acronym TRIZ which is based upon Russian rather than English: teoriya resheniya izobretatelskikh zadatch. Perhaps we should merge the TRIZ stuff over here and generalise the topic as others are likely to have had similar ideas - idealised solutions, getting it right first time, &c. Andrew (talk) 18:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
The book does not "focus on this particular aspect of TRIZ," but discusses the whole TRIZ process. As to WP:RECOGNIZABLE, the TRIZ article may need a name change, but that's a different process. -- 101.119.14.127 (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge to TRIZ, since this is an integral subtopic of that, and is not notable on its own. -- 101.119.14.127 (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.