Could not load that page.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Volke

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Igor Volke

Igor Volke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, bald assertions about being the most famous Estonian ufologist notwithstanding. jps (talk) 15:48, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete- I see some limited recent coverage of this person in an Estonian newspaper (which Google Translate does an unusually wretched job of translating), but I cannot judge its reliability. There's also a few books written by this person and some passing mentions in Google books but I don't think any of it rises to the level of significant coverage. I'm aware that this may be pro-English systemic bias at work so I am open to changing my vote if someone comes up with useful sources. Reyk YO! 02:41, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
  • delete until notability is established. It isn't "pro-English systemic bias" to insist that the burden of showing the topic passes WP:NOTE lies with the article creator. --dab (𒁳) 13:57, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.