- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Jordan Journal of Physics
- Jordan Journal of Physics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable journal. The "impact factor" listed in the article is from a company called "Universal Impact Factor", identified as a fake by Jeffrey Beall (see this list]). Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 08:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 11:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 11:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing suggests this is a notable journal and as summarized in the nomination it does not meet criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:21, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, nomination covers it. Fails all applicable inclusion criteria. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.