- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
List of embedded analytics tools
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of embedded analytics tools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NLIST, there are no reliable sources that compare or discuss different embedded analytics tools. I could only find unreliable corporate blogs. Every entry under "Purpose-built embedded analytics tools" is non-notable, so there is not much of a reason to merge. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 04:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Products, Software, and Lists. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 04:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Helpful Raccoon - I agree the separation of the tools into groups was probably unnecessary so I have made an edit to reflect that. The category as a whole is very significant with multiple independent sources cited and market guides shared in the references, along with evidence of the significance economically (Dresner Advisory, Forbes, Fortune Business Insights, BARC & Eckerson Group). I have added Nucleus Research as an additional independent comparative research source in the latest edit. Rjsage (talk) 07:17, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- You should not be editing the article at all since you have a conflict of interest; you can use the Edit Request Wizard to propose edits for review. The Nucleus Research source does not seem to be independent, since their website states
Nucleus provides a broad range of products and services to help technology vendors deliver a credible ROI message to customers and prospects.
The Forbes source is just a PR piece. The BARC report doesn't just focus on embedded analytics. Not sure about the other sources, but there are a lot of market research companies that churn out low-quality reports. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 08:18, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- You should not be editing the article at all since you have a conflict of interest; you can use the Edit Request Wizard to propose edits for review. The Nucleus Research source does not seem to be independent, since their website states
- Helpful Raccoon - I agree the separation of the tools into groups was probably unnecessary so I have made an edit to reflect that. The category as a whole is very significant with multiple independent sources cited and market guides shared in the references, along with evidence of the significance economically (Dresner Advisory, Forbes, Fortune Business Insights, BARC & Eckerson Group). I have added Nucleus Research as an additional independent comparative research source in the latest edit. Rjsage (talk) 07:17, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Reads like a user-based analysis. Koshuri (あ!) 03:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - too WP:TECHNICAL and cluttered with bad formatting. 182.185.42.137 (talk) 08:45, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.