- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 05:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
MensXP.com
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MensXP.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cannot find reliable, extensive second party coverage. Google news shows nothing , beyond placed advertisements on news articles. Likely a non-notable per WP:NCORP. Sources currently cited are press releases from the Times group, and a piece from the Economic Times covering the acquisition. The claim about the number of webhits per day is completely uncited, and I cannot find any secondary source to support the assertion.
In making this, I applied from NCORP this analysis on the sources I found, and on the sources in the article itself:
| Source | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Pass/Fail | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Economic Times |  N |  Y | Y | Y | N | Coverage about the acquisition by the Times group |
| MensXP.com | N | N | N | N | N | Self-description |
| Press release from the Times group | N | N |  ? | N | N | Press releases are not considered reliable secondary sources |
| Outlook India | N | Y | Y | N | N | A passing reference to the site does not make it inherently notable |
| Total qualifying sources | 0 | There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements | ||||
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Content does not appear to be useful to any reader and article looks unlikely to be expanded any time soon Slywriter (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep (Vote by article creator) Notable for the following reasons:
1. MensXP has been mentioned or used as a source 144 times by Wikipedia English.
2. It has its own award the "MensXp icon of newHood".
3. MensXP has been title co-sponsor of Provogue MensXP Mr India World 2014.
4. Various milestones and activities related to MensXP have been considered notable enough to have been written about in independent, secondary, reliable sources. A few are shared here:
4.1. Prince Khanna joins MensXP.com as Director, Business Development & Sales
4.2. MensXP launches India’s first online men’s lifestyle shopping festival featuring over 250 brand
4.4. MensXP celebrates first anniversary of digital cover with Saif Ali Khan
Yogesh Khandke (talk) 02:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Times Internet#Subsidiaries and products Site is a naked churnalism portal. Nate • (chatter) 22:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per sources provided above. And also coverage provided by this book. Santosh L (talk) 07:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as the source evalatuion above is completely accurate; the article is missing three significant independent reliable secondary sources. The reasons for notability listed above are not compliant with WP:NCORP and are blatant trivial coverage. —FORMALDUDE(talk) 05:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, nothing here passes WP:NCORP. The sources presented above are mostly routine announcements, not the kind of in-depth coverage of the business that meets NCORP. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.