No article found for “Cabinet of Christian Lundeberg?action=edit&redlink=1”.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Wister Review

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge selectively to University of Wyoming#Student life as a sensible ATD. Owen× 18:31, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Owen Wister Review

Owen Wister Review (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hello, this is now defunct. The magazine does not warrant its own article due to not meeting the notability guideline. JasmineHolian (talk) 03:07, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Literature, Poetry, and Wyoming. JasmineHolian (talk) 03:07, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Being defunct is not a reason to delete the article. Because it twice won an award from the Associated College Press, it seems possible that the magazine is notable. This kind of magazine sometimes attracts reviews of the individual issues. Before deleting, someone should do a focused search to see if any such issue reviews exist, because if there are several, that would be an indicator of notability. ~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 17:16, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
I agree that being defunct is not a reason to delete the article; the lack of WP:SIGCOV in independent sources is. Personally, I couldn’t find anything online. Merge with University of Wyoming. Wanwa (talk) 08:55, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.