Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UrbanDaddy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 06:09, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

UrbanDaddy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A digitanl newsletter and publication with not notable coverage or real world notability. Rather a specific topic for a Wikipedia both product, web or corp or gng. Mozzcircuit (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York. Shellwood (talk) 08:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
~~Delete, not WP:GNG.~~ Keep based on Opposec's sources. The app is interesting. Felinaex ^{(purr / pawprints)} 23:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Keep it has coverage for Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies): Digiday/PageSix/TheNextWeb/Sactown Magazine/more. Can be better but enough. Opposec (talk) 23:43, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we have a source analysis for the presented sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:41, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 07:20, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.