- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn.A merge-proposal may be later floated. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Young Woman Engineer
*Withdraw nomination - other editor found source and added in the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 23:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Young Woman Engineer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A WP:BEFORE found no WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS. Fails WP:NONPROFIT. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 08:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 08:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 08:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 08:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment It looks like it could be usefully merged into IET Achievement Medals. If it is kept, it should be renamed to "Young Woman Engineer of the Year Award". XOR'easter (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Nope I agree with the above. If anything this a merge, this is obviously notable stuff. Nominating for deletion just adds needless drama. We need to discuss the structure of the articles. This article should stay while that happens. Victuallers (talk) 20:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, or otherwise merge, but do not loose this valuable content. It appears that the nom's "before" failed to search using the award's former name, "Girl Technician of the Year", which finds sig cov., including coverage in New Scientist and The Daily Telegraph. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:51, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.