- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete under U1. — ξxplicit 01:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
User:Dans/Future
Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST. User's last edit to subpage was in 2007, and user is no longer very active. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 01:19, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 04:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not comfortable with this process. A user creates a subpage, days after starting an account, likely ignorant of the proscription against such a page, only edits it one day, and never since. Odds are high editor has completely forgotten about it. In the meantime, the editor has contributed, even has a DYK. Wouldn't it be better to simply send a polite, personal note to the user, reminding the editor of the page, and suggesting that {{db-userreq}} might be in order. This process feels rude.--SPhilbrickT 15:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. While I agree with SPhilbrick, the user has not been active for ten weeks, and their last edit at the page was three years ago, and we are here now, so the inevitable may as well occur. Johnuniq (talk) 07:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Please Delete, I've no worry about it. I was in pause for a while, as I was living in Africa, and this was actually an old sandbox page I had forgot about it. And yes, as Sphilbrick said, a personal note would be enough to begin with this process. --Dans (talk) 09:18, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.