- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per user request. ✗plicit 10:24, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
User:DougheGojiraMan/sandbox
- User:DougheGojiraMan/sandbox/Vlogging Through History (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Alt-history fictional election sandboxes with no encyclopedic value. User was previously warned about created these types of sandboxes earlier this year and had previous sandboxes deleted for similar reasons but continued to create new ones anyways. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 21:41, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- Dude, let’s not get ahead of ourselves here. Administrator User:Whpq already declined the offer, so let’s just move past this. DougheGojiraMan (talk) 21:46, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- I declined the speedy deletion requests because they were not elegible for U5, and for that reason only. -- Whpq (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- see relevant discussion. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 21:54, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- Can’t we just talk it out? DougheGojiraMan (talk) 21:55, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- Delete all: Wikipedia is not a repository for alternate history fantasies. Curbon7 (talk) 23:34, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- Delete all - Wikipedia is not a web host for future history elections. -- Whpq (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- Delete all - I would've just said how sandboxes are kinda just practice sites for other users and I to improve my skills on, which is why not all sandboxes come into fruition. But I realized that even if it was practice, there's a reason why I abandoned two of those sandboxes. So never mind, you guys can delete them.
- DougheGojiraMan (talk) 02:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- Delete all as per above, and also because the use of images of living persons in a contrary-to-fact fashion is a BLP violation. See also Wikipedia is not for alternate history and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.