Wikipedia:PERM

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗
    Requests for permissions

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 00:30, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

    Permissions

    Handled here

    • Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.
    • Temporary account IP viewer (add request · view requests): Temporary account IP viewers are able to view the IP address information associated with temporary accounts.

    Handled elsewhere

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Review and removal of permissions

    The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    Requestors

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting the permission.

    Administrators

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    Account creator

    Autopatrolled

    User:ItsShandog

    I have been editing since May last year and have created more than 25 articles. Two of them are rated B‑class, and most of the others are C‑class or Start‑class. Two of my articles, Presley Gerber and Killing of Sonia Exelby, were nominated for deletion because of differing views on their notability, but both were kept. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItsShandog (talk • contribs) 11:59, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

    Hi @ItsShandog, could you explain how you created Brendan MegrawBrendan Megraw in Diff/1290863082? Why did you use the {{navbox}} template in Diff/1290872406 and how did you produce that in such a short amount of time? Why did you remove the {{ai-generated}} tag (added in Diff/1348062842), along with utm_source=chatgpt.com parameters, in Diff/1348070103 and then restore the original redirect in Diff/1379884757 a couple of months later? ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:59, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
    That would have been around the time I was new to Wikipedia from what I can recall, and looking at it now, it was days after I joined when I would have used ChatGPT. That was before I knew much about AI or about Wikipedia. I stopped using it a long time ago, as I saw how unreliable it was even before the ban on Wikipedia. I cannot explain the navbox, as I have no idea what that is. I would assume it was something to do with ChatGPT at that time. In regard to restoring it to a redirect, that was more to do with the fact that I was editing the disappeared page that covers all those people, and the page more or less repeats the same thing. It does not have any more information than the disappeared page. It was not anything to do with my old edits, as I did not even notice the ChatGPT bit on it. I forgot about that edit, as it was over a year ago. If I had remembered, I would have gone back and fixed all of that, but it is better as a redirect anyway. ItsShandog (talk) 15:17, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
    The reason for the removal of the AI part was that this was at the point when I did not use it anymore, but I had not fixed the page at that stage, so I should not have removed it. That was my own fault. There were so many pages I would have edited when I was new that I could not remember them all, but any I come across now I try to fix. I probably removed the ChatGPT part because I would have assumed that was what the template was referring to. That would have been me trying to fix the page, but to be honest I did not know the ins and outs of AI until recently, or all the different ways it is incorrect. Even back in April I just assumed a page was tagged with that because it had old links from ChatGPT and that type of thing. It is only when I have started to read the AI signs page on Wikipedia that I have learned about all the different things it does. If I had known that in April, I would have done a lot of copyediting and fixing of that page. ItsShandog (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Realcosmixyt

    I've been fully editing Wikipedia since May of this year, and I've created almost 50 active articles. I have had a couple deleted in my early days and, in recent times, have had about one nominated for deletion, but it was kept without hassle. Thanks! ReelCosmix (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Biplab Anand

    I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. My previous request was declined due to a copyright-related concern. I acknowledge the feedback and remain committed to complying with Wikipedia's copyright policy and content guidelines.

    I request a reassessment of my article-creation record and subsequent contributions. Thanks Biplab Anand (Talk) 01:42, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

    AutoWikiBrowser

    User:Script7921

    I want to use AutoWikiBrowser to speed up my deorphaning process as well as for general maintenance tasks. Script7921 (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:3vw5

    Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights for Janes citation issue. Issue description: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Janes_citation_zotero_issue 3vw5 (talk) 11:43, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

    @3vw5, is this the only task you want to use AutoWikiBrowser for? If so, you should ask at Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2026 (UTC)
    Currently yes. Janes is a well known source for military articles. The issue will be recurring. I am even fine with a temporary permission 3vw5 (talk) 07:05, 27 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Mr Cadno

    I'd like to access the autowikibrowser to use the find and replace tool to change the constituencies for Welsh places with the infobox field constituency_welsh_assembly, as there are certainly hundreds of places in Wales with the old constituencies in their infoboxes. Otherwise, if there's a more appropriate tool for that kind of thing I'd like to know. Mr Cadno (talk) 18:43, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

    Confirmed

    Event coordinator

    User:Myoglobin

    Event organizer and board member of meta:Wikimedians of Chicago User Group, needs to be able to grant confirmed and manage CampaignEvents. We have one event currently active. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 18:59, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

    Thanks for nominating, Dan! I'm happy to grant if Myoglobin could just confirm that he needs the permission here. —⁠TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 21:26, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
    Yes, thank you!! Myoglobin (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
     Done —⁠TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed

    User:A Random Hylian alt

    Legitimate alternate account to A Random Hylian, requesting EC permissions as I already am extended-confirmed on my main account. A Random Hylian alt (talk) 12:10, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

    I confirm that I am in control of this account. signed, A Random Hylian (Read!) (What'd I do?) (contribs) 12:12, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
     Done Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 18:22, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

    File mover

    Mass message sender

    New page reviewer

    User:Pattersonuwu

    Been doing RCP for a while now, would like to try helping out with this backlog :3 Although I don't have much experience at AfD, I like to think I can detect egregious cases, or inform the creator with maintenance tags and things otherwise. pattersonuwu njz (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguill talk 14:16, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Red0ctober22

    Requesting renewal of my right as my trial has ended. I haven't had the opportunity to review as many pages as I would have liked to, but am definitely still interested in helping with new pages and still believe I can be helpful in it. Red0ctober22 (talk) 01:27, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

    Let's do another trial run given the small amount of articles you were able to review. Done for another month.  Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:18, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:AriuCH

    I would like to request permanent New Page Reviewer access. My current access expires on 18 November 2026. Thank you for considering my request. AriuCH (talk) 13:30, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 18 November 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 13:30, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
     Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Giovanni Guasconti

    I'd like to have a trial run. I've been editing for quite a while across different subject areas. Thanks! Giovanni Guasconti (a word with me) 14:45, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user has 218 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 14:50, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
    Looks like you still fall short of the prerequisites of 500 mainspace edits. I would consider overlooking that if you had a strong AFD or article creation record, but you don't seem to have done any work in those areas yet.  Not done for now, but feel free to reapply once you have more experience. signed, Rosguill talk 14:20, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:GothicGolem29

     Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:25, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Emmanbotan

    Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights:Hello. I would like my rights renewed, as it is currently about to expire. I have participated in AFC mostly, and I am pretty active of AI notice boards, I'm also an AFC reviewer Emmanbotan🌹 (talk) 21:54, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 6 November 2026 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 22:00, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    Page mover

    Pending changes reviewer

    User:DylanMReed

    I have well understood WP:PCR and I pass WP:PCCRITERIA. I shouldn't claim that I am something special, so I rest my request for granting Admin. Whatever is decided, I would accept with good faith. Dylan Reed (Ping me) 08:12, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

    @ppre Dylan Reed (Ping me) 10:06, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
    Normally, I would have summarily granted PCR, but this edit makes me pause. Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
    Actually, upon further review, you are also broadly topic-banned.  Not done for now. Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:38, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
    Accepted with good faith. Can I askyou a thing? Does TBAN prohibit rights? Dylan Reed (Ping me) 01:23, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
    No. However, the topic ban was less than a month before this application, and your behavior there makes me question your judgment regarding Wikipedia's core content policies regarding notability, reliable sourcing, and verifiability. Reviewer is, at the end of the day, a content userright. Additionally, this request sat open for two weeks without any other admin being willing to grant it, while other requests were being granted. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:49, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:TheEpicEgg56

    I’m applying for the WP:PCR user right because I want whatever backlog it has by the time one reads it as low as possible. I have also read all mentioned policies in the section on prerequisites. TheEpicEgg56 04:33, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:CharlieRidesRollerCoasters

    I am requesting to see if I am ready to help wikipedia a lot more, I am respecting your decision. Thank you CharlieRidesRollerCoasters (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:AnonymousScholar49

    I would like to request the pending changes reviewer permission. I'm familiar with WP:PCR, Wikipedia:Vandalism, WP:VANDTYPES/WP:VANDNOT, and content policies. I have 2,023 edits. I'm active in recent changes, patrol, AfD, and writing.

    I will use this permission to help clear the pending changes backlog, and further my anti-vandalism efforts.

    Thank you. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 16:06, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    Rollback

    User:DocLG

    I would like rollback to handle obvious vandalism more efficiently. I enjoy monitoring for spam, unconstructive edits, and talking to/notifying newer editors . I have read WP:ROLLBACK and will not use the default rollback summary on good-faith or disputed edits. Thanks. DocLG (talk) 22:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

     Not done. User has not edited in a month. Please re-request if you return to Wikipedia. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:13, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Justcgi

    I'd like to have rollback permissions so I can utilize tools like AntiVandal to help out with recent changes patrol. Justcgi (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user has 182 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 15:50, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
    Probably understated by alott Justcgi (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:TobyKohlhagen

    I would like to have rollback permissions to use Interceptor while out and about :) TobyKohlhagen (talk) 01:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user has 188 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 08:20, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
    this probably would've increased past 200 by now TobyKohlhagen (talk) 06:16, 22 October 2026 (UTC)
     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Evercool1

    My reason for requesting rollback permissions is so I can make Recent Changes Patrolling easier with tools like Huggle and Interceptor instead of patrolling the old-school way. Evercool1 (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:13, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Leaf.Sheap

    I would like to have rollback rights so I can use Interceptor in order to do RCP on mobile. FYI, I've already been granted Pending changes reviewer. —Leaf.Sheap ⇖ /.°°.\ ⇗ (They•Them) 16:21, 12 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Kalpesh Manna 2002

    Reason for requesting rollback rights I would like to request rollback rights be better handle repeated vandalism incidents in Wikipedia articles. It will be beneficial and helpful for me to use such as Interceptor and Antivandal tools. Thank you. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 05:14, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:10, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Issac I Navarro

    I have been editing Wikipedia for a few years now. I do some of my work on articles related to WikiProject Schools. I believe rollback right might be helpful in reverting obvious vandalism. There is often a lot going on when it comes to schools. I am not particularly technically savvy and have done most of my editing by doing everything manually. It may take me a while to learn this tool, as it did take me forever to finally start using Twinkie. So I do hope that this tool might help me work more efficiently. Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:17, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:JeyReydar97

    100k edits with eight years of experience in editing here. The reason for requesting rollback permissions is the need of cleaning up professional wrestling-related articles which I am constantly patrolling and keeping updated and away of spam or unsourced edits on a daily basis. JeyReydar97 (talk) 11:33, 15 October 2026 (UTC)

     Not done I'm not seeing much experience with recent changes patrolling. If you're looking to clean up those articles your best bet is Twinkle (or just undoing) anyway; rollback is mostly useless for anything besides RCP. TonySt  01:52, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
    I don't really agree with this decision. JeyReydar97 has 8 years of experience and more edits than either of us. Unless there's something I'm missing, he definitely understands when he can and cannot use rollback. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:07, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Bucket of Bubbles

    I would like to request rollback rights. I do a lot of recent changes patrolling, and I think the rollback function and the tools that require the right would prove very helpful to me while patrolling. A while ago, I requested the rights and then realized I did not have 200 mainspace edits, so I withdrew my request. However, I should now have over 200 edits in the mainspace, and would appreciate if I could be granted the right. Thanks! Bucket of Bubbles (talk) 23:44, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 01:40, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:EditWarCriminal

    I would be honored to be granted the powers of the legendary Rollback flag to further destroy the morale of the nefarious vandal empire in my exalted conquest. They shall no longer have any hope of escape once I lay my eyes upon them and their unexplained content removals. EditWarCriminal (talk) 17:59, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

    EditWarCriminal, is this a serious request? Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:04, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:208yeahh

    I am very active, and I use Twinkle but i feel as if getting rollback rights would give me access to more better tools and could help me make more reverts more fast, I have over 400+ edits, Anyways thanks for your time. Cheers, 208𝑦𝒆𝑎𝒉ℎ (talk) 03:36, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

     Not done. I don't think you have quite enough experience just yet. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:03, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:T430s

    I have been patrolling recent changes for a while with RedWarn and I would like to get rollback permissions so I can use CVPI. T430s • [ Talk ] 13:55, 26 October 2026 (UTC) T430s • [ Talk ] 13:55, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:WhiteTailedEagle

    I have reverted vandalism, BLP violations and unsourced changes, as well as being a pending changes reviewer for over a month, so I think rollback will be very useful for me. 🦅White-tailed eagleTalk to the eagleStalking eagle 14:06, 27 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:GrinningIodize

    Hello! I'm GrinningIodize, and I would like to apply for the role of rollbacker. I have over 2000 edits on the English Wikipedia, and I enjoy hunting down vandalism and reverting it, so I'm hoping to get access to the new Special:AbuseReview tool. What would you all think about adding me as a rollbacker? GrinningIodize (you just lost the game) (talk) 17:56, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Beta Beta Beta

    Have more than 200 mainspace eidts, no recent history of edit warring, have consistently notified editors using Twinkle's warning feature. Given that I have had a RC patrol userbox since April, it should be clear that I have more than a month's experience of such. Beta Beta Beta - talk 00:44, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done MCE89 (talk) 07:40, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Bennett Li11

    Reason for requesting rollback rights I would like rollbacker to help out by using the AntiVandal tool, to help quickly revert bad faith changes. Bennett Li11 (Talk to Me) 01:56, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    @Bennett Li11: could you explain these recent reverts of yours? . Nikkimaria (talk) 02:32, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
    @Nikkimaria,
    Just wanted to get more involved in vandalism and stuff.
    Cheers,
    Bennett Li11 (Talk to Me) 02:52, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
    Do you believe those are reverts of vandalism? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:53, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
    @Nikkimaria,
    No. These were recommended ‘check’ changes.
    Cheers,
    Bennett Li11 (Talk to Me) 04:58, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
     Not done. A large number of your recent reverts are questionable. Please review WP:BITE and WP:NOTVAND. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:17, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Kapicapybara

    I would like to have the rollback permission to speed up my recent changes patrolling with tools like Interceptor and AntiVandal. I've been patrolling for over two months now, I understand when rollback can and cannot be used, and I always leave an appropriate warning on the user's talk page after a revert. Thank you for considering my request! Kapicapybara (they/them) (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Emmanbotan

    Reason for requesting rollback rights I would like rollback rights to easily revert edits. Emmanbotan🌹 (talk) 05:00, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

    Template editor

    User:Axolitl

    Hello. I am requesting that my temporary TE rights be made permanent. As a TE, my edits have mostly consistented in non-controversial dark mode fixes/improvements and fulfilling edit requests. If I see a change that I think may be controversial, I try to bring it up on the talk page to discuss. While I have made some mistakes in the past by pressing publish too soon, I make sure to try and slow down and preview/test my changes. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 03:36, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary template editor rights by Primefac (expires 00:00, 2 November 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 03:40, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
    Pinging @Primefac as they previously granted me this right. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 01:48, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
     Done – SD0001 (talk) 06:26, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:JeyReydar97

    Hi. I am requesting TE rights due to frequently working with creating and sorting templates, mainly architecture and sports-related templates, and recently engaging into authority database extra ID recommendations. JeyReydar97 (talk) contribs 09:56, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

    Standard Guidelines review:
    1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 7)
    2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~99.5k)
    3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~5k)
    4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
    5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0)
    6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0)
    Primefac (talk) 10:35, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
     Not done for lack of demonstrated need; the mini-edit war at Template:Grand Slam-Triple Crown Champions is a little concerning as well. Primefac (talk) 10:35, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

    Temporary account IP viewer

    User:RadioactOlive

    I've done a good deal of recent changes and anti-vandalism patrolling, and believe TAIV would help in that regard. I agree to use it in accordance with Foundation policy. radioactOlive(she/it)(talk) 07:41, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 10:17, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

    User:Zalaraz

    I have decent experience in filing SPI reports against UPE sockfarms. I am also AfC reviewer. I want the right so that I can combat sockpuppetry and vandalism. I agree to use this right in accordance with the Foundation's guidelines. Zalaraz (talk) 11:59, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

     Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:37, 30 October 2026 (UTC)