Larry Sanger
Larry Sanger (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
23 June 2026
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- ~2026-34360-03 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
I realize this is a bit of a longshot, but I am struck by the language this temp user uses in support of Sanger, with the most recent being "This page serves as a valuable historical artifact, documenting the specific project and methodology that were central to the discussions leading up to the creator's community ban." I wonder how anyone but Sanger would use the phrase "valuable historical artifact" to describe a page he created. the Stefen 𝕋ower 04:38, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Also, this diff from the ANI discussion shows both a complete rejection of remedies and a very specific defense that seems like it could only come from Sanger, as it puts his efforts in the most pristine light. the Stefen 𝕋ower 04:54, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I agree that this is a
longshot
, and thus there really isn't anything we can or should do here. There's obviously lots of offwiki discourse going on right now, and I really don't think that opposing sanctions and using the phrase "valuable historical artifact" are at all sufficient to conclude that Sanger and the TA are related.
Closing without action. Staraction (talk · contribs) 05:03, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
