| |||||||||||||||||||
| General information |
|---|
|
| Sub-projects |
| Matters of interest |
| Resources |
| Newsletter (The Downlink) |
| User |
ROS and OPSEK
Now that ROSS has become ROS (Russian Orbital Station) with the same plan as OPSEK, shouldn't Russian Orbital Station and OPSEK be merged together, as iterations of the same project? ROS is no longer a new station built from scratch, but the OPSEK plan, of taking modules from the ISS and building out a separate station. -- ~2026-21583-41 (talk) 03:22, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- Or, if OPSEK is kept separate, then Russian Orbital Station and Russian Orbital Service Station (new build station) should instead be separated, as the plan for a new build station is not the current plan -- ~2026-21583-41 (talk) 03:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Exploration of Jupiter
Exploration of Jupiter has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:29, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
WikiProject Rocketry
Hello. I have been looking through Wikipedia:WikiProject Rocketry, and realised it's dead. I'm trying to revive it. Are there any articles we could collaborate on? AZenit3 (talk) 02:04, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, there is considerable overlap. Petscan shows 1368 articles flagged as being of interest to both WikiProjects:
- https://petscan.wmcloud.org/?psid=47175687
- Note that obviously rocketry is used for many applications other than spaceflight, and spaceflight includes many subjects unrelated to rocketry. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 23:14, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Recreate space stations task force
Could we recreate Mir, ISS and Gateway task force as Mir, ISS and Tiangong task force now that Gateway is dead? Doeze (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- The old task force asserted it was a "child" of both Wikiproject Spaceflight and Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations. If the task force is resurrected in a similar form (as seems appropriate) it likely makes sense to do it after consultation with them. Which stations are in-scope? ISS obviously. Mir due to Shuttle-Mir. Has Tiangong been visited by a vehicle launched by another country? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 01:47, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
- I fail to see a reason to exclude strictly national stations, if such exist. However, I am also not seeing why such a task force would attract enough interest to make it thrive. Jim.henderson (talk) 06:46, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 June 14#Category:Individual cockroaches
This discussion about the space traveler Nadezhda may interest the tens-of-thousands of members of this WikiProject. Or at least a couple. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:13, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

