In algebraic geometry, a finite morphism between two affine varieties
X
,
Y
{\displaystyle X,Y}
is a dense regular map which induces isomorphic inclusion
k
[
Y
]
↪
k
[
X
]
{\displaystyle k\left[Y\right]\hookrightarrow k\left[X\right]}
between their coordinate rings, such that
k
[
X
]
{\displaystyle k\left[X\right]}
is integral over
k
[
Y
]
{\displaystyle k\left[Y\right]}
.[1] This definition can be extended to the quasi-projective varieties, such that a regular map
f
:
X
→
Y
{\displaystyle f\colon X\to Y}
between quasiprojective varieties is finite if any point
y
∈
Y
{\displaystyle y\in Y}
has an affine neighbourhood V such that
U
=
f
−
1
(
V
)
{\displaystyle U=f^{-1}(V)}
is affine and
f
:
U
→
V
{\displaystyle f\colon U\to V}
is a finite map (in view of the previous definition, because it is between affine varieties).[2]
Definition by schemes
A morphism f: X → Y of schemes is a finite morphism if Y has an open cover by affine schemes
-
V
i
=
Spec
B
i
{\displaystyle V_{i}={\mbox{Spec}}\;B_{i}}
such that for each i,
-
f
−
1
(
V
i
)
=
U
i
{\displaystyle f^{-1}(V_{i})=U_{i}}
is an open affine subscheme Spec Ai, and the restriction of f to Ui, which induces a ring homomorphism
-
B
i
→
A
i
,
{\displaystyle B_{i}\rightarrow A_{i},}
makes Ai a finitely generated module over Bi (in other words, a finite Bi-algebra).[3] One also says that X is finite over Y.
In fact, f is finite if and only if for every open affine subscheme V = Spec B in Y, the inverse image of V in X is affine, of the form Spec A, with A a finitely generated B-module.[4]
For example, for any field k,
Spec
(
k
[
t
,
x
]
/
(
x
n
−
t
)
)
→
Spec
(
k
[
t
]
)
{\displaystyle {\text{Spec}}(k[t,x]/(x^{n}-t))\to {\text{Spec}}(k[t])}
is a finite morphism since
k
[
t
,
x
]
/
(
x
n
−
t
)
≅
k
[
t
]
⊕
k
[
t
]
⋅
x
⊕
⋯
⊕
k
[
t
]
⋅
x
n
−
1
{\displaystyle k[t,x]/(x^{n}-t)\cong k[t]\oplus k[t]\cdot x\oplus \cdots \oplus k[t]\cdot x^{n-1}}
as
k
[
t
]
{\displaystyle k[t]}
-modules. Geometrically, this is obviously finite since this is a ramified n-sheeted cover of the affine line which degenerates at the origin. By contrast, the inclusion of A1 − 0 into A1 is not finite. (Indeed, the Laurent polynomial ring k[y, y−1] is not finitely generated as a module over k[y].) This restricts our geometric intuition to surjective families with finite fibers.
Properties of finite morphisms
- The composition of two finite morphisms is finite.
- Any base change of a finite morphism f: X → Y is finite. That is, if g: Z → Y is any morphism of schemes, then the resulting morphism X ×Y Z → Z is finite. This corresponds to the following algebraic statement: if A and C are (commutative) B-algebras, and A is finitely generated as a B-module, then the tensor product A ⊗B C is finitely generated as a C-module. Indeed, the generators can be taken to be the elements ai ⊗ 1, where ai are the given generators of A as a B-module.
- Closed immersions are finite, as they are locally given by A → A/I, where I is the ideal (section of the ideal sheaf) corresponding to the closed subscheme.
- Finite morphisms are closed, hence (because of their stability under base change) proper.[4] This follows from the going up theorem of Cohen-Seidenberg in commutative algebra.
- Finite morphisms have finite fibers (that is, they are quasi-finite).[4] This follows from the fact that for a field k, every finite k-algebra is an Artinian ring. A related statement is that for a finite surjective morphism f: X → Y, X and Y have the same dimension.
- By Deligne, a morphism of schemes is finite if and only if it is proper and quasi-finite.[5] This had been shown by Grothendieck if the morphism f: X → Y is locally of finite presentation, which follows from the other assumptions if Y is Noetherian.[6]
- Finite morphisms are both projective and affine.[4]
See also
Notes
- Shafarevich 2013, p. 60, Def. 1.1.
- Shafarevich 2013, p. 62, Def. 1.2.
- Hartshorne 1977, Section II.3.
- Stacks Project, Tag 01WG.
- Grothendieck, EGA IV, Part 4, Corollaire 18.12.4.
- Grothendieck, EGA IV, Part 3, Théorème 8.11.1.
References
- Grothendieck, Alexandre; Dieudonné, Jean (1966). "Éléments de géométrie algébrique: IV. Étude locale des schémas et des morphismes de schémas, Troisième partie". Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS. 28: 5–255. doi:10.1007/bf02684343. MR 0217086.
- Grothendieck, Alexandre; Dieudonné, Jean (1967). "Éléments de géométrie algébrique: IV. Étude locale des schémas et des morphismes de schémas, Quatrième partie". Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS. 32: 5–361. doi:10.1007/bf02732123. MR 0238860.
- Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157
- Shafarevich, Igor R. (2013). Basic Algebraic Geometry 1. Springer Science. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37956-7. ISBN 978-0-387-97716-4.