In differential geometry, the integration along fibers of a k-form yields a
(
k
−
m
)
{\displaystyle (k-m)}
-form where m is the dimension of the fiber, via "integration". It is also called the fiber integration.
Definition
Let
π
:
E
→
B
{\displaystyle \pi :E\to B}
be a fiber bundle over a manifold with compact oriented fibers. If
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
is a k-form on E, then for tangent vectors wi's at b, let
-
(
π
∗
α
)
b
(
w
1
,
…
,
w
k
−
m
)
=
∫
π
−
1
(
b
)
β
{\displaystyle (\pi _{*}\alpha )_{b}(w_{1},\dots ,w_{k-m})=\int _{\pi ^{-1}(b)}\beta }
where
β
{\displaystyle \beta }
is the induced top-form on the fiber
π
−
1
(
b
)
{\displaystyle \pi ^{-1}(b)}
; i.e., an
m
{\displaystyle m}
-form given by: with
w
i
~
{\displaystyle {\widetilde {w_{i}}}}
lifts of
w
i
{\displaystyle w_{i}}
to
E
{\displaystyle E}
,
-
β
(
v
1
,
…
,
v
m
)
=
α
(
v
1
,
…
,
v
m
,
w
1
~
,
…
,
w
k
−
m
~
)
.
{\displaystyle \beta (v_{1},\dots ,v_{m})=\alpha (v_{1},\dots ,v_{m},{\widetilde {w_{1}}},\dots ,{\widetilde {w_{k-m}}}).}
(To see
b
↦
(
π
∗
α
)
b
{\displaystyle b\mapsto (\pi _{*}\alpha )_{b}}
is smooth, work it out in coordinates; cf. an example below.)
Then
π
∗
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}}
is a linear map
Ω
k
(
E
)
→
Ω
k
−
m
(
B
)
{\displaystyle \Omega ^{k}(E)\to \Omega ^{k-m}(B)}
. By Stokes' formula, if the fibers have no boundaries(i.e.
[
d
,
∫
]
=
0
{\displaystyle [d,\int ]=0}
), the map descends to de Rham cohomology:
-
π
∗
:
H
k
(
E
;
R
)
→
H
k
−
m
(
B
;
R
)
.
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}:\operatorname {H} ^{k}(E;\mathbb {R} )\to \operatorname {H} ^{k-m}(B;\mathbb {R} ).}
This is also called the fiber integration.
Now, suppose
π
{\displaystyle \pi }
is a sphere bundle; i.e., the typical fiber is a sphere. Then there is an exact sequence
0
→
K
→
Ω
∗
(
E
)
→
π
∗
Ω
∗
(
B
)
→
0
{\displaystyle 0\to K\to \Omega ^{*}(E){\overset {\pi _{*}}{\to }}\Omega ^{*}(B)\to 0}
, K the kernel,
which leads to a long exact sequence, dropping the coefficient
R
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }
and using
H
k
(
B
)
≃
H
k
+
m
(
K
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {H} ^{k}(B)\simeq \operatorname {H} ^{k+m}(K)}
:
-
⋯
→
H
k
(
B
)
→
δ
H
k
+
m
+
1
(
B
)
→
π
∗
H
k
+
m
+
1
(
E
)
→
π
∗
H
k
+
1
(
B
)
→
⋯
{\displaystyle \cdots \rightarrow \operatorname {H} ^{k}(B){\overset {\delta }{\to }}\operatorname {H} ^{k+m+1}(B){\overset {\pi ^{*}}{\rightarrow }}\operatorname {H} ^{k+m+1}(E){\overset {\pi _{*}}{\rightarrow }}\operatorname {H} ^{k+1}(B)\rightarrow \cdots }
,
called the Gysin sequence.
Example
Let
π
:
M
×
[
0
,
1
]
→
M
{\displaystyle \pi :M\times [0,1]\to M}
be an obvious projection. First assume
M
=
R
n
{\displaystyle M=\mathbb {R} ^{n}}
with coordinates
x
j
{\displaystyle x_{j}}
and consider a k-form:
-
α
=
f
d
x
i
1
∧
⋯
∧
d
x
i
k
+
g
d
t
∧
d
x
j
1
∧
⋯
∧
d
x
j
k
−
1
.
{\displaystyle \alpha =f\,dx_{i_{1}}\wedge \dots \wedge dx_{i_{k}}+g\,dt\wedge dx_{j_{1}}\wedge \dots \wedge dx_{j_{k-1}}.}
Then, at each point in M,
-
π
∗
(
α
)
=
π
∗
(
g
d
t
∧
d
x
j
1
∧
⋯
∧
d
x
j
k
−
1
)
=
(
∫
0
1
g
(
⋅
,
t
)
d
t
)
d
x
j
1
∧
⋯
∧
d
x
j
k
−
1
.
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}(\alpha )=\pi _{*}(g\,dt\wedge dx_{j_{1}}\wedge \dots \wedge dx_{j_{k-1}})=\left(\int _{0}^{1}g(\cdot ,t)\,dt\right)\,{dx_{j_{1}}\wedge \dots \wedge dx_{j_{k-1}}}.}
[1]
From this local calculation, the next formula follows easily (see Poincaré_lemma#Direct_proof): if
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
is any k-form on
M
×
[
0
,
1
]
,
{\displaystyle M\times [0,1],}
-
π
∗
(
d
α
)
=
α
1
−
α
0
−
d
π
∗
(
α
)
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}(d\alpha )=\alpha _{1}-\alpha _{0}-d\pi _{*}(\alpha )}
where
α
i
{\displaystyle \alpha _{i}}
is the restriction of
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
to
M
×
{
i
}
{\displaystyle M\times \{i\}}
.
As an application of this formula, let
f
:
M
×
[
0
,
1
]
→
N
{\displaystyle f:M\times [0,1]\to N}
be a smooth map (thought of as a homotopy). Then the composition
h
=
π
∗
∘
f
∗
{\displaystyle h=\pi _{*}\circ f^{*}}
is a homotopy operator (also called a chain homotopy):
-
d
∘
h
+
h
∘
d
=
f
1
∗
−
f
0
∗
:
Ω
k
(
N
)
→
Ω
k
(
M
)
,
{\displaystyle d\circ h+h\circ d=f_{1}^{*}-f_{0}^{*}:\Omega ^{k}(N)\to \Omega ^{k}(M),}
which implies
f
1
,
f
0
{\displaystyle f_{1},f_{0}}
induce the same map on cohomology, the fact known as the homotopy invariance of de Rham cohomology. As a corollary, for example, let U be an open ball in Rn with center at the origin and let
f
t
:
U
→
U
,
x
↦
t
x
{\displaystyle f_{t}:U\to U,x\mapsto tx}
. Then
H
k
(
U
;
R
)
=
H
k
(
p
t
;
R
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {H} ^{k}(U;\mathbb {R} )=\operatorname {H} ^{k}(pt;\mathbb {R} )}
, the fact known as the Poincaré lemma.
Projection formula
Given a vector bundle π : E → B over a manifold, we say a differential form α on E has vertical-compact support if the restriction
α
|
π
−
1
(
b
)
{\displaystyle \alpha |_{\pi ^{-1}(b)}}
has compact support for each b in B. We write
Ω
v
c
∗
(
E
)
{\displaystyle \Omega _{vc}^{*}(E)}
for the vector space of differential forms on E with vertical-compact support.
If E is oriented as a vector bundle, exactly as before, we can define the integration along the fiber:
-
π
∗
:
Ω
v
c
∗
(
E
)
→
Ω
∗
(
B
)
.
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}:\Omega _{vc}^{*}(E)\to \Omega ^{*}(B).}
The following is known as the projection formula.[2] We make
Ω
v
c
∗
(
E
)
{\displaystyle \Omega _{vc}^{*}(E)}
a right
Ω
∗
(
B
)
{\displaystyle \Omega ^{*}(B)}
-module by setting
α
⋅
β
=
α
∧
π
∗
β
{\displaystyle \alpha \cdot \beta =\alpha \wedge \pi ^{*}\beta }
.
Proposition—Let
π
:
E
→
B
{\displaystyle \pi :E\to B}
be an oriented vector bundle over a manifold and
π
∗
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}}
the integration along the fiber. Then
-
π
∗
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}}
is Ω ∗ ( B ) {\displaystyle \Omega ^{*}(B)}
-linear; i.e., for any form β on B and any form α on E with vertical-compact support,
-
π
∗
(
α
∧
π
∗
β
)
=
π
∗
α
∧
β
.
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}(\alpha \wedge \pi ^{*}\beta )=\pi _{*}\alpha \wedge \beta .}
-
π
∗
(
α
∧
π
∗
β
)
=
π
∗
α
∧
β
.
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}(\alpha \wedge \pi ^{*}\beta )=\pi _{*}\alpha \wedge \beta .}
- If B is oriented as a manifold, then for any form α on E with vertical compact support and any form β on B with compact support,
-
∫
E
α
∧
π
∗
β
=
∫
B
π
∗
α
∧
β
{\displaystyle \int _{E}\alpha \wedge \pi ^{*}\beta =\int _{B}\pi _{*}\alpha \wedge \beta }
.
-
∫
E
α
∧
π
∗
β
=
∫
B
π
∗
α
∧
β
{\displaystyle \int _{E}\alpha \wedge \pi ^{*}\beta =\int _{B}\pi _{*}\alpha \wedge \beta }
Proof: 1. Since the assertion is local, we can assume π is trivial: i.e.,
π
:
E
=
B
×
R
n
→
B
{\displaystyle \pi :E=B\times \mathbb {R} ^{n}\to B}
is a projection. Let
t
j
{\displaystyle t_{j}}
be the coordinates on the fiber. If
α
=
g
d
t
1
∧
⋯
∧
d
t
n
∧
π
∗
η
{\displaystyle \alpha =g\,dt_{1}\wedge \cdots \wedge dt_{n}\wedge \pi ^{*}\eta }
, then, since
π
∗
{\displaystyle \pi ^{*}}
is a ring homomorphism,
-
π
∗
(
α
∧
π
∗
β
)
=
(
∫
R
n
g
(
⋅
,
t
1
,
…
,
t
n
)
d
t
1
…
d
t
n
)
η
∧
β
=
π
∗
(
α
)
∧
β
.
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}(\alpha \wedge \pi ^{*}\beta )=\left(\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{n}}g(\cdot ,t_{1},\dots ,t_{n})dt_{1}\dots dt_{n}\right)\eta \wedge \beta =\pi _{*}(\alpha )\wedge \beta .}
Similarly, both sides are zero if α does not contain dt. The proof of 2. is similar.
◻
{\displaystyle \square }
See also
Notes
- If
α
=
g
d
t
∧
d
x
j
1
∧
⋯
∧
d
x
j
k
−
1
{\displaystyle \alpha =g\,dt\wedge dx_{j_{1}}\wedge \cdots \wedge dx_{j_{k-1}}}
, then, at a point b of M, identifying ∂ x j {\displaystyle \partial _{x_{j}}}
's with their lifts, we have:
-
β
(
∂
t
)
=
α
(
∂
t
,
∂
x
j
1
,
…
,
∂
x
j
k
−
1
)
=
g
(
b
,
t
)
{\displaystyle \beta (\partial _{t})=\alpha (\partial _{t},\partial _{x_{j_{1}}},\dots ,\partial _{x_{j_{k-1}}})=g(b,t)}
-
π
∗
(
α
)
b
(
∂
x
j
1
,
…
,
∂
x
j
k
−
1
)
=
∫
[
0
,
1
]
β
=
∫
0
1
g
(
b
,
t
)
d
t
.
{\displaystyle \pi _{*}(\alpha )_{b}(\partial _{x_{j_{1}}},\dots ,\partial _{x_{j_{k-1}}})=\int _{[0,1]}\beta =\int _{0}^{1}g(b,t)\,dt.}
By the same computation, π ∗ ( α ) = 0 {\displaystyle \pi _{*}(\alpha )=0}
if dt does not appear in α.
-
β
(
∂
t
)
=
α
(
∂
t
,
∂
x
j
1
,
…
,
∂
x
j
k
−
1
)
=
g
(
b
,
t
)
{\displaystyle \beta (\partial _{t})=\alpha (\partial _{t},\partial _{x_{j_{1}}},\dots ,\partial _{x_{j_{k-1}}})=g(b,t)}
- Bott & Tu 1982, Proposition 6.15.; note they use a different definition than the one here, resulting in change in sign.
References
- Michele Audin, Torus actions on symplectic manifolds, Birkhauser, 2004
- Bott, Raoul; Tu, Loring (1982), Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, New York: Springer, ISBN 0-387-90613-4