Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice start!
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 18:14, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
( )
- ... that according to The Sydney Morning Herald, Flawed Hero: Truth, lies and war crimes "offers an important corrective – hero worship must not be blind"? Source: https://www.smh.com.au/culture/books/hero-worship-must-never-be-blind-the-lesson-from-chris-masters-20230731-p5dsnu.html
Moved to mainspace by TarnishedPath (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 23 past nominations.
TarnishedPathtalk 10:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC).
- Comments by Tbhotch
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
A new article that is long enough. It is neutral, no copyvios per se, and the QPQ is done. The hook is interesting and sourced. The issue I find, however is that 1. {{no plot}}. The template is not physically there, but there is no plot. 2. The critical reception section is mostly composed of copyrighted quotations--more than the non-quoted text. This has to be reduced significatively. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 04:17, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch:, thanks for your review. I'll have a look at it, and the article, over the next few days. TarnishedPathtalk 10:35, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch:, I've added a synopsis section and summarised the longest quote. Please have a look. TarnishedPathtalk 09:35, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
The article was expanded. The article now has a summary, and the critical reception is no longer based on quotes. The additions are mentioned in the sources. GTG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbhotch (talk • contribs) 06:19, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
- Adding a procedural tick to ensure Tbhotch's approval moves this nom to the approved list. (Tbh, please be sure to sign your comments; an approval tick does not actually approve the hook unless the comment is signed, thanks!) Dclemens1971 (talk) 06:25, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
