No article found for “Two-coloured bindweed?action=edit&redlink=1”.

User talk:A person of sorts

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation: Opeti Helu (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EarthDude was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
EarthDude (wanna talk?) 14:48, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Aaron Feis when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deji Olatunji (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Valorrr was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Use of departed sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Valorrr (lets chat) 12:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, A person of sorts! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Valorrr (lets chat) 12:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Playmakerstats

Hi A person of sorts. Thanks for creating Lucas Massaccesi. Going forward, please do not use the website Playmakerstats as a reference. It has been categorised as unreliable; see WP:WPFLINKSNO for details. I have removed a Playmakerstats reference at Lucas Massaccesi and elsewhere. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi Robby - thanks for informing me. Wasn't aware of that one being unreliable and will not use in future. Cheers. A person of sorts (talk) 22:41, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
You're welcome. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:28, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Death of Achazia James (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event for more information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:09, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi A person of sorts. Thank you for your work on Ali Haider Shah. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work! Please fix the bare URL in footnote 1. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SSundee (October 29)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Vrxces was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is a page that has been rejected five times, which is not alone a factor to reject but a strong indicia that other editors have consistently figured the subject does not meet WP:GNG. None of the sources have the combination of being significant commentary about the subject as opposed to various appearances - this shows where many sources just happen to menton SSundee had a video on something about an Among Us mod as opposed to being about him. Moreover, other than the drama about DoubleJump or the irrelevant Among Us sources, none of these sources are really WP:RS of the calibre we'd consider contribute to notability - see WP:VG/S for examples. In additon - there's just...not a lot here at all. The personal life section is uncited. The uncited "Unique Style and Impact" section, in addition to being uncited, using the unnecessary heading, "X, Y and Z" listing has hallmarks of AI generation. Please don't use AI to draft an article, and examine the WP:GNG, the WP:VG/S and WP:VG/MOS when drafting articles in future.
VRXCES (talk) 06:33, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Fidel Valdez when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:50, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Hello A person of sorts. Regarding the recent revert you made to Nell Fisher: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. ✨ΩmegaMantis✨❦blather | ☞spy on me 02:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Savannah Bond has been accepted

Savannah Bond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TarnishedPathtalk 06:50, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Savannah Bond when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:59, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Savannah Bond has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, A person of sorts. I've nominated Savannah Bond, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,  to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you knowDYK comment symbol. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. ~~~~

TarnishedPathtalk 06:40, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Erotides has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Erotides. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:06, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erotides has been accepted

Erotides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Olga Greceanu

Hi. The Manual of Style/Biography states"The opening paragraph should usually have dates of birth and (when applicable) death. These dates (specific day–month–year) are important information about the subject, but if they are also mentioned in the body, the vital year range (in brackets after the person's full name) may be sufficient to provide context. The dates of birth and death are mentioned in the body and in the Infobox. Surely that is enough? Roundtheworld (talk) 19:29, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi!
On this regard, I do think that provides a lot of context, but perhaps it's my personal view that it being in those parentheses at the start couldn't hurt. I think it could go either way, and infoboxes are great, but my view is that if there's someone looking super briefly at an article of DOB or DOD, it'll be right there for them. The rule here seems like it's saying you can have the date there, but it isn't required. Good rule, but I don't think it'd hurt just to have them there for viewing. Most articles do have the full dates in those parentheses. That being said, I am not an expert editor. If you're feeling like the article here, which you're contributing to most significantly, should just have the year, I won't try to revert or anything.
Cheers,
A person of sorts (talk) 20:24, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Information icon Hello, I'm Sangdeboeuf. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Ana Foxxx, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

AVN performer profiles are often copied from other websites and cannot be treated as reliable; see WP:PORN#AVN. There is a strong presumption in favor of privacy regarding personal identifying information such as full names and dates of birth; such information must be published by the subject themselves or else widely published by reliable sources to be included. Thank you.Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:51, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:52, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Savannah Bond

On 10 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Savannah Bond, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Savannah Bond (pictured) sold cosmetics before entering the adult film industry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Savannah Bond. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Savannah Bond), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Hook update
Your hook reached 54,915 views (2,288.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2026 – nice work!
GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:27, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

HurricaneZetaC 00:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Governor of Tabasco
added links pointing to El Carmen, Heriberto Jara, National Revolutionary Party and Carlos Madrazo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vanessa Veracruz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vanessa Veracruz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:08, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Vanessa Veracruz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vanessa Veracruz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Veracruz (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Atlantic306 (talk) 23:48, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles McDonnell(American Politician)

A tag has been placed on Charles McDonnell(American Politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Squawk7700 (talk) 21:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

This should as far as I'm aware just be procedural clean up (I'm aware you just moved the page so sorry the notification went to you). Have a nice day ~ Squawk7700 (talk) 21:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Hi Squawk7700.
Appreciate the heads up - I figured it was all procedural. I appreciate the speedy delete of the redirect. Still a little new to some Wiki processes.
Have a nice day
A person of sorts (talk) 21:07, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

thank

Hello, good afternoon, comrade. I have noticed that you have made an edit to my article. I hope that your edit will be beneficial, and I am grateful that you have noticed my article and decided to edit and improve it. Ņikitas Fon Vadonu-Dusmasis (talk) 15:26, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Ņikitas Fon Vadonu-Dusmasis! And welcome to Wikipedia.
I am glad to help in any way I can, and look forward to seeing future edits from you. Feel free to reach out if you have any questions!
A person of sorts (talk) 17:26, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Truman Hanks (May 4)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ArthurTheGardener, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
The sources really only really show the subject in relation to his father. It needs proper, independent sourcing, if this exists.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Truman Hanks to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ArthurTheGardener (talk) 16:26, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Angelina Please

On 7 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Angelina Please, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that trans porn star Angelina Please was credited with saving a life shortly before losing hers at the age of 24? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Angelina Please. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Angelina Please), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:02, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 22,074 views (919.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

2026 Butler Plane Crash Article

Sorry to disturb you but did you see a Cite Error when you edited the article? I saw a Cite Error when I looked at this from another device but I refreshed the article and it was fixed and it said that you edited it. Did you see the message and fix it, or was it just something like a software error. - N198UA (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

I think it was a cite error. I saw the issue and I went in to fix it.
A person of sorts (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
@N198UA
(Sorry forgot to notify)
A person of sorts (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
It’s okay. Thank you for fixing it. - N198UA (talk) 12:28, 15 June 2026 (UTC)