User talk:AmyJHolden

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

August 2025

Information icon

Hello AmyJHolden. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Atom Learning, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AmyJHolden. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AmyJHolden|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 17:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

I have updated my User:AmyJHolden page to include the form suggested above that disclosures that I work at Atom Learning. I also included a disclosure in my original draft that notes that I work for Atom Learning:
Disclosure: This article may have been initially created or edited by individuals affiliated with Atom Learning or entities compensated by the company. Editors have aimed to maintain Wikipedia's neutral point of view standards and ensure verifiability through reliable, independent sources. All content has been written in accordance with Wikipedia's policies on neutral point of view, verifiability, and notability.
Please let me know if there is anything else I need to include to allow me to continue editing this draft page, thank you. AmyJHolden (talk) 15:20, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atom Learning (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
jlwoodwa (talk) 17:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
I would like to continue editing my draft page, I have posted a mandatory disclosure to my user page at User:AmyJHolden. Can I continue to edit the draft and make the above changes following your feedback? Thanks AmyJHolden (talk) 08:34, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Yes. jlwoodwa (talk) 12:52, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, AmyJHolden! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jlwoodwa (talk) 17:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atom Learning (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 16:33, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi, does this feedback apply to every section of the article, or is it specific to certain sections? Regarding the comment about materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed, would you like me to remove all links to the Atom Learning website? AmyJHolden (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi, please can you respond to my message above - does this feedback apply to every section of the article, or is it specific to certain sections? Regarding the comment about materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed, would you like me to remove all links to the Atom Learning website? AmyJHolden (talk) 11:29, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
So what you need to do is add multiple secondary independent reliable sources with significant coverage on, Commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization. For example, any critiques about the company or its product, no matter its negative or positive. Analysis about the company and its product by critiques. Such coverage provides an organization with a great level of attention instead of seen just as promotion. RangersRus (talk) 19:02, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Atom Learning

Information icon Hello, AmyJHolden. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atom Learning, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Atom Learning

Hello, AmyJHolden. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Atom Learning".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:25, 22 June 2026 (UTC)