User talk:Andy Caryo

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Welcome!

Hello, Andy Caryo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kate (film) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  BOVINEBOY2008 13:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ava Caryofyllis (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
WP:TOOSOON. Fails WP:NACTOR. Needs more time and roles.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 21:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Andy Caryo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 21:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ava Caryofyllis (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fermiboson was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Subject is a minor, so we need to be especially careful about notability and quality of sources here. The only source which I see might be reliable and with significant coverage is the first source, which is not enough for WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. If you resubmit, please read those guidelines carefully and point out which sources meet which criteria in order to increase your chances of getting accepted.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Fermiboson (talk) 12:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, At this stage I was hoping to keep the page and move it to my Userspace as per Message below. How would I do that? And many thanks for your help.
----------------------------
Hello, Andy Caryo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ava Caryofyllis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 8 May 2026 (UTC) Andy Caryo (talk) 06:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ava Caryofyllis

Information icon Hello, Andy Caryo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ava Caryofyllis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi there, have asked before but requesting that it be moved to my userspace. Hopefully this is seen as I don't want to lose the page. Andy Caryo (talk) 06:51, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi there,
Just checking in again to see if this can be moved to my user space and not deleted. Haven't heard back from anyone and hoping someone sees this. Thank you. Andy Caryo (talk) 04:50, 19 June 2026 (UTC)