User talk:Astharosh · Paulipedia

Will figure out Talk page archiving soon!

For now deleted all topics that are no longer active.

Nomination of Ibanera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ibanera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibanera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

MediaKyle (talk) 16:44, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in 2007 Australian motorcycle Grand Prix, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Timtjtim (talk) 12:23, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Wim de Ron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wim de Ron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wim de Ron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

– SimpleObjects-9 ei 🏖️/☀️/🥵 (🌎 CentralAuth) 23:34, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

LLM use

Please refrain from creating articles using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such a technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, even if you intend to fix them later. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 04:08, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Astharoth, how much LLM do you use? Geschichte (talk) 05:09, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Unreliable sources

Hi Astharosh. Some of your newly created articles seem to heavily rely on sources considered unreliable by the community: FootballDatabase.eu, Playmakerstats, Ogol, Soccerzz, perhaps others… Please see WP:WPFLINKSNO for football-specific unreliable sources and make sure to not use them going forward. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:50, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Astharosh, is it LLM that finds these sources? Geschichte (talk) 05:10, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nafeesisboujee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nafeesisboujee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 18:32, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zoar (musician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zoar (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Writing articles backwards

You seem to be writing some of your articles backwards. You should gather your references before starting to write the article, to ensure that they meet the notability requirements. You shouldn't write an article in the mainspace and then hope that you might find enough acceptable references that it survives deletion.

You should also read up on what types of sources Wikipedia considers acceptable for establishing notability. A lot of users are shocked that many sources they think are good are actually disqualified by default from establishing notability. These include but are not limited to:

self-published sources with user-generated content and no editorial review - this includes all social media, message forums, and open wikis (including Wikipedia itself)
The only exception to this rule are official social media accounts of existing reliable sources (e.g. a mainstream TV news channel), as it is presumed that content has undergone the same editorial review as their main publication
primary sources, where the subject themself provides the information - this includes interviews with the subject, and the subject's own official website

Wikipedia requires significant coverage from sources that are both reliable (having an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight) and independent (having no personal, political or financial interest in the subject being discussed).

Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources has a list of recommended sources (and sources to avoid) for music topics. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:20, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Your article at Wim de Ron was full of unsourced or improperly sourced content, and with misleading references which suggested content was referenced which was not. Please do not do that. Giant Snowman 20:34, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Astharosh, was LLM behind all these problems? Geschichte (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2026 (UTC)