Welcome!
Hello, BauhausDisco, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!
CS1 error on 2026 Hatzola arson attack
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Hatzola arson attack, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:19, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
Hello, I'm Sir Nuttingham. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nigel Farage have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sir Nuttingham (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ulster Defence Regiment. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sir Nuttingham (talk) 15:31, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- It is your own roll-backs that support falsities being published on this platform. The UDR were a civil defence regiment - not a 'terrorist regiment'.
- There is no evidence other than opinions on one side of the political/religious spectrum stating that they are terrorists. BauhausDisco (talk) 15:35, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nigel Farage, you may be blocked from editing. Cicada1010 (talk) 17:59, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- It is public domain knowledge that Mr Farage is a homosexual. I was mistaken in stating that he was openly gay. I am very surprised that long-time editors are displaying this level of homophobia. We should be proud of our LGBT politicians regardless of their political beliefs. BauhausDisco (talk) 18:05, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- Are there any reliable sources that say that he is in fact a homosexual? Koubaki (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- Are there any reliable sources that say the UDR is a 'terrorist regiment'? It seems like there's a double standard where the far right is embellished on Wikipedia. This is just one of the reasons why Wikipedia is shunned in academia. BauhausDisco (talk) 18:29, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not talking about the UDR. I'm talking about Nigel Farage. If you think your edit is constructive, please list one or more reliable sources agreeing with your statement. I'd also recommend learning about how Wikipedia works. Reliable sources publish pages that Wikipedia cites in articles. You can use this logic to understand if your edits are constructive. Koubaki (talk) 18:36, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- I understand how Wikipedia works, I have edited and researched articles extensively. It is knowledge in the public domain that Nigel Farage is a homosexual and we should embrace that, to go against it would be homophobic. BauhausDisco (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- If you do understand Wikipedia, you should list one or more reliable sources. Just because you think something is common knowledge doesn't mean Wikipedia should list it. Koubaki (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- Article descriptions do not necessitate sources. We all know that he is a politician and broadcaster, and do not feel the need to include a footnote. BauhausDisco (talk) 18:41, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- If you do understand Wikipedia, you should list one or more reliable sources. Just because you think something is common knowledge doesn't mean Wikipedia should list it. Koubaki (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- I understand how Wikipedia works, I have edited and researched articles extensively. It is knowledge in the public domain that Nigel Farage is a homosexual and we should embrace that, to go against it would be homophobic. BauhausDisco (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not talking about the UDR. I'm talking about Nigel Farage. If you think your edit is constructive, please list one or more reliable sources agreeing with your statement. I'd also recommend learning about how Wikipedia works. Reliable sources publish pages that Wikipedia cites in articles. You can use this logic to understand if your edits are constructive. Koubaki (talk) 18:36, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- Are there any reliable sources that say the UDR is a 'terrorist regiment'? It seems like there's a double standard where the far right is embellished on Wikipedia. This is just one of the reasons why Wikipedia is shunned in academia. BauhausDisco (talk) 18:29, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- Are there any reliable sources that say that he is in fact a homosexual? Koubaki (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2026 (UTC)