User talk:CG7000

Welcome!

Hello, CG7000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Eastern Europe did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Introduction to referencing
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Austronesier (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Utopia (Travis Scott album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:17, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

There is no reason to revert all my edits in the article just because I removed the unsourced genres from the infobox. Genres need to be supported by sources, not by an opinion (see WP:NPOV). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:59, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

November 2023: Please do not revert edits without an explanation

Please do not perform unexplained reverts of constructive edits, as you did here. There is no excuse for reverting non-vandalism edits without a reason. I removed those genres because the prose explicitly refers to them as "elements", not as full genres, therefore they should not be in the infobox per WP:EXPLICITGENRE. Thank you. Ss112 23:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

June 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:44, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Keir Starmer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 17:45, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Filthy Frank Show (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IAmChaos was:

Articles may be speedily deleted from Wikipedia (i.e. without discussion), if they do not indicate why the subject is important. For more info, see WP:A7. If you think this topic is notable, please indicate why, and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Filthy Frank Show and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 04:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, CG7000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 04:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Filthy Frank Show (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Niafied was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Filthy Frank Show and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Niafied (talk) 02:31, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Filthy Frank Show (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Somepinkdude was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Filthy Frank Show and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Somepinkdude (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

I'm going to have to disagree here. It needs a lot of work of course, and has WAY too many unusable sources, but those which would remain demonstrate sufficient notability and an article is warranted. Marcus Markup (talk) 17:59, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks and i’d agree myself. I do think I relied too much on YouTube references, but with some extra help from others and more high quality references, I think it would warrant joining mainspace. CG7000 (talk) 18:46, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

I have 6K+ edits and have been here for a few years... not bragging by any means, just saying. There is a reason I have not tried to create anything new.... I have seen the issues which come with creating new articles. I have enough on my plate without dealing with all that. I wish you luck. Marcus Markup (talk) 18:52, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

That’s totally understandable, and thanks anyways. CG7000 (talk) 18:53, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Steve Laws, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Asmongold, you may be blocked from editing. Marcus Markup (talk) 20:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much.

I like it to drive with a Tesla !!!

Gerold Hug ~2026-29118-0 (talk) 05:42, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

"Vandalism"

Please avoid labelling edits as vandalism unless they're clear vandalism as you did with this edit at Joji (musician). Vandalism has a very specific definition on Wikipedia, and can otherwise be construed as casting WP:ASPERSIONS. Thanks. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 21:25, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hello, I'm Marcus Markup. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Asmongold have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Marcus Markup (talk) 10:58, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Life of Pablo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Re: Michael Jackson album chronology

You can disagree with it, however, this is a community consensus. You can revert the consensus by opening a discussion elsewhere. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 04:07, 9 June 2026 (UTC)