User talk:CozyWinter

☆ Save On Wikipedia ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation: After the Spike has been accepted

After the Spike, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk) 14:41, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for responding to my submission so quickly! CozyWinter (talk) 14:51, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Works in Progress (June 5)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This needs to meet the WP:GOLDENRULE, with ideally three examples of good sources which are truly independent of the subject. MediaBias isn't considered a reliable source, due to using self published sources.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Works in Progress to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 16:05, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, CozyWinter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 16:05, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, CozyWinter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ChrysGalley (talk) 16:06, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello.
If you are referring to After the Spike I do not have any conflict of interest in regards to it or any other article I have edited. Is there something wrong with my username? I have never received compensation for any edit. This account is only used by one person and that is me. CozyWinter (talk) 16:37, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
It is more whether you have a connection with these articles, such as a personal connection, not just whether you have received compensation. I'm happy to take on board your confirmation. ChrysGalley (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
I have not had, currently do not and will not have any personal connection to anything I have edited. Is there anything I can do to show that I do not? CozyWinter (talk) 17:07, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
No, that's fine. It's quite routine to ask about this if a draft for something a bit obscure. A fairly high percentage of drafts come "sponsored" in some way or other, so there are templated question panels for this. We assume good faith here, and what you have said is as comprehensive as it gets. Thank you for the clarification. ChrysGalley (talk) 17:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Okay I understand. Thank you and unless there is anything else I can help you with I wish you a great rest of your day. CozyWinter (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:Ecomodernism

icon Template:Ecomodernism, a dependency of this page, has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 05:54, 24 June 2026 (UTC)