The infobox on Acapulco
I don't see any problem; the word 'Municipality' is only used twice, and each time it's used as a one-word heading for a row (and so no nobr is needed). Am I missing something? --ais523 08:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- There's still no visible problem for me; it's probable that the problem only shows up with certain browser settings for things like font sizes, and such problems have been known to happen only on certain browsers too (I'm using Firefox 2 at the moment). You might want to mention this on the technical village pump; the regulars there are better at both finding the problem and figuring out how to fix it than I would be just by myself, as with more people looking into it there's more of a chance that the exact problems causing the conditions will be reproduced. --ais523 08:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:37. Sexton High Tower.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
Flint MTA

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Message added —Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 18, 2014; 13:33 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Michigan gubernatorial election, 2018
Hello I know Mark Schauer will be a maybe canadate becuse I think he will be makeing a come back please Potential meains they are thinking about running or maybe they will be running please I know. If he Decline we will put him under Decline.
CS1 error on 2026 Michigan Senate election
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Michigan Senate election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:16, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Do you have a source for Peoria, Illinois switching from cumulative voting (back) to plurality block voting for its at-large city council seats? (Your April 7, 2025 edit to Peoria, Illinois)
Looking at a sample ballot ( https://www.peoriaelections.gov/DocumentCenter/View/862/2023-Consolidated-General-Election-Sample-Ballot , found via archive.org from https://web.archive.org/web/20230329163935/https://www.peoriaelections.gov/201/Sample-Ballots ) from 2023, which was the last election (or at least the last non-special election, or non-by-election if you're a Brit) for the at-large council seats (the terms are for four years with the ward members elected the year after a presidential election and the at-large members elected the year before a presidential election), the equal and even variant of cumulative voting was still used in that election, with instructions to voters indicating the number of votes each candidate they vote for receives from them based on how many candidates they vote for (5 votes divided by the number they voted for, while other examples of the method use 1 as the numerator, although if one wanted to eliminate fractional votes one would use the least common multiple of all the natural numbers up to the maximum one would vote for as the numerator), while they could vote for no more than five (the number of seats up). It could be some law change was passed or an old court decision reversed (I'm sure most Trump-appointed federal judges aren't very keen on voting methods like that, even though it could actually help Republicans in urban areas) that will go into effect for the next time the at-large seats are up in 2027. But I thought I'd ask if you had any documentation of the change. The other part of your edit to that article that day (specifying that the ward seats are elected by plurality voting) was good. Thanks. Kevin Lamoreau (talk) 12:29, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Kevin Lamoreau, it seems you are correct that cumulative voting is used for the at-large seats. I guess I just assumed it was block voting, because that's typically how at-large spots are elected in municipal elections across the country. You can correct that in the article, then. Thanks.. Criticalthinker (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for your prompt reply. Kevin Lamoreau (talk) 17:12, 18 June 2026 (UTC)