| User page | Let's talk! | My sandboxes |
NOTE! It is recommended to use English to create a new discussion, in order to give a chance to other users to give another reply after reading this. Foreign languages are not recommended, and it might be suitable to discuss on Wikipedia in one's own language.
Disambiguation link notification for September 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cube, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
@Dedhert.Jr Turkikoko9 (talk) 06:36, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
CS1 error on Octahedron
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Octahedron, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
 |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026! |
|
Hello Dedhert.Jr, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Your nomination of Pentagonal bipyramid is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Pentagonal bipyramid is 
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ajay Platinum -- Ajay Platinum (talk) 16:42, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Pentagonal bipyramid is on hold
Your good article nomination of the article Pentagonal bipyramid has been placed 
on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ajay Platinum -- Ajay Platinum (talk) 06:21, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Pentagonal bipyramid has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Pentagonal bipyramid has 
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ajay Platinum -- Ajay Platinum (talk) 08:47, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Contribution to Graph theory and geometry
 |
The Mathematics Barnstar | |
| I would like to recognize you for your work on the Graph Theory article and various geometry related articles by awarding you this barnstar. Continue the great work you are doing! EulerianTrail (talk) 15:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC) |
24-cell
Note that after your edits, 24-cell#Notes is full of broken references. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- @1234qwer1234qwer4. Yes. I haven't clean up yet. I need some time to restructure the article. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 01:45, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas
You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:52, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- Alaska is U.S. state. Just say it from the United States down to Chile. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 01:11, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Some might forget Alaska and misread that as excluding Canada. —Antonissimo (talk) 06:58, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- Oh my ... Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:24, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- Some might forget Alaska and misread that as excluding Canada. —Antonissimo (talk) 06:58, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Augmented triangular prism is on hold
Your good article nomination of the article Augmented triangular prism has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OzmoOzmo -- OzmoOzmo (talk) 23:21, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Augmented triangular prism has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Augmented triangular prism has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OzmoOzmo -- OzmoOzmo (talk) 02:21, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Riemann integral
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Riemann integral, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:20, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polynomial, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Field theory was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:48, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Personalised comments about my editing
Please do not personalise comments about my editing or reviewing skills on article talk pages, as was done in this edit ("I am worried that the reviewer may overlook the keyword below. This similar problem has already been done in Mayer–Vietoris sequence, demanding additional citation where the topic has been covered below"). If there is a concern with my editing or reviewing skills, please post on my talk page or raise the issue at WT:GA. It's also OK to take time away from GAN/GAR if the process is exhausting (as characterised in your comment): no article has to have GA status, and an editor does not have to "save" or make improvements to an article as we are all volunteers. Z1720 (talk) 20:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Z1720. You were right, I should have open the thread personally to your talk page. My apologize for this one.
- To extensively clarify my comment. When I meant that "may overlook the keyword", I meant you continously ignored {{slink}}, which can redirect immediately in the below sections. Although GACR 2b stated "reliable sources are inline cited, all could be reasonably challanged", I don't think your demanding on citations does seems to be editorial discretion. In two articles, namely, Mayer–Vietoris sequence and Prime number, you already give {{slink}} to redirect and a section's summary before you deeply read the below subsections. So adding citations to them are useless, usually bombing with citations, but this might be depend on the environmental of given quality. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 03:08, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- I made a mistake in adding citation needed templates to those summaries without checking that the information was below. When I saw citations earlier in some of the paragraphs, I assumed that everything in that paragraph would need to be cited annd did not see that they were cited later in the section. However, review comments and citation needed tags are not "demands", they are posted to draw attention to areas where I think the article doesn't meet the GA criteria. When posting about it at WT:GA, many editors have stated that reviews should not be interpreted as demands as no one has to respond to them. If you think the process can be fixed to prevent this interpretation, I suggest posting at WT:GA.
- I saw in some of the discussions that you might nominate prime number to FAC: I recommend getting a FA mentor who hasn't reviewed or edited the article yet to get a new perspective of what improvements might be needed before the article goes to FAC. You can also open a WP:PR where editors might give feedback on the article (I usually recommend that editors open a PR if I am mentoring them so I can leave comments there). Lastly, I would review articles now at WP:FAC: this builds goodwill amongst FAC editors, helps clear the backlog so your nomination is more likely to be noticed, and helps teach the criteria to reviewers, as you can get feedback on how the criteria is interpreted. Z1720 (talk) 02:35, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- My apologies for excessive peacock on "demanding". I will try to do better in this. For FAC, this has been discussed in Talk:Prime number/GA1. But if I would like to promote this to FAC, PR is a good option according to you. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 03:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive
| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive |  |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Biaugmented triangular prism is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Biaugmented triangular prism is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ajheindel -- Ajheindel (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Biaugmented triangular prism has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Biaugmented triangular prism has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ajheindel -- Ajheindel (talk) 19:02, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
 |
Hello Dedhert.Jr! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |