Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashwini Sharan (June 27)
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashwini Sharan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Dillanprasad!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:32, 27 June 2025 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashwini Sharan (July 6)
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashwini Sharan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashwini Sharan (July 15)
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please provide significant coverage on the subject through secondary independent reliable sources and not from sources that the subject is associated or affiliated with.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashwini Sharan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi RangerRus,
- Thank you for your edits. Regarding your comment: "Please provide significant coverage on the subject through secondary independent reliable sources and not from sources that the subject is associated or affiliated with."
- It is my view that the sources provided clearly demonstrate significant coverage of Dr. Sharan and are not affiliated or otherwise associated with him. For example, professional society leadership biographies are written by independent parties. Scientific citations, including patents (several of which were included) are peer-reviewed. More citations include the standardized faculty page from Jefferson, which is also developed by a 3rd party, as well as a New York Times article about Dr. Sharan's work. Can you please clarify what further sources are asked by the Editors, as well as how the provided materials are not sufficiently independent as Dr. Sharan has had no part in crafting any of them?
- Further, regarding notability, Dr. Sharan was elected President of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, the foremost professional society of neurosurgeons in the world. This fulfills the notability criteria for academics, even though Dr. Sharan is much more than an academic and has had a broader impact on technology and policy.
- Thank you for your comments! Dillanprasad (talk) 02:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashwini Sharan (September 14)
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashwini Sharan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Concern regarding Draft:Ashwini Sharan
Hello, Dillanprasad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashwini Sharan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:09, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Ashwini Sharan
Hello, Dillanprasad. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ashwini Sharan".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 08:26, 14 March 2026 (UTC)