User talk:EliG233 · Paulipedia

One on One Football moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to One on One Football. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One on One Football (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One on One Football and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 14:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, EliG233! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 14:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One on One Football (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources, not tutorials on how to play the game.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One on One Football and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:22, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One on One Football (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AstrooKai were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

The comment the reviewer left was:

This need more citations from independent reliable sources to demonstrate significant coverage and notability. A how-to guide document is not enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One on One Football and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AstrooKai (Talk) 16:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One on One Football (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources provided do not meet Wikipedia guidelines for notability - they are not reliable independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One on One Football and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:58, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One on One Football (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AllCatsAreGrey was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One on One Football and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 22:54, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Muckleball for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muckleball is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muckleball until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Muckleball

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Muckleball requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 08:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

I was just wondering Keep Away is a form of bullying to and they have the article on Wikipedia EliG233 (talk) 23:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Muckleball

I’ve updated Muckleball is this what it needs? EliG233 (talk) 22:43, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One on One Football (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AstrooKai was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One on One Football and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AstrooKai (Talk) 00:31, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Relay Ball (Game) (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bunnypranav was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still does not have significant coverage and sources like others said.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Relay Ball (Game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:54, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry I’m struggling to know what’s even noticeable on here anymore EliG233 (talk) 01:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Relay Ball (Game) (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cactusisme was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Relay Ball (Game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 09:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Relay Ball (Game) (June 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

CoconutOctopus talk 22:21, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Blocked again

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Can you unblock me I gave Wikipedia a one star please EliG233 (talk) 01:27, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Also I’m a real person not a bot and I’m not trolling either EliG233 (talk) 01:29, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

I know who you are, and I know you're not trolling. As you've been before, Wikipedia is not the appropriate place to promote games that you make up. There are many social media platforms where you can do this, but you can't do it at Wikipedia, and we're going t block you every time you try. I'm sorry that you wasted your time here, but you should really know better by now. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 11:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Also, as you are discovering, our edit filters are not going to let you post about your games anymore in article space or talk pages. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

This is kind of confusing to edit on here EliG233 (talk) 12:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Can you edit on Biddy Basketball EliG233 (talk) 12:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

You can't edit anywhere. You are banned from Wikipedia. Please stop wasting your time here and focus your efforts on your social media accounts instead. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:17, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

I’m not trying to promoting the game it’s just hard to edit on here EliG233 (talk) 12:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

You are not being truthful. The link you keep trying to add includes references to the game you made up. I'm sure you mean well, but I'm trying to save you from wasting further time. You will be blocked every time you create an account and try to add anything about games you have made up, period. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Biddy Basketball

I do want to edit on Wikipedia not promoting the game EliG233 (talk) 12:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

That's not going to happen. I've revoked your talk page access since you refuse to acknowledge why you are blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:32, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your email

Emailing people is not going to help. We've tried to tell you many times that Wikipedia is not a social media or fandom site; there are plenty of places on the Internet to write about your game, but it clearly doesn't meet the inclusion criteria for Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)