User talk:IntelligereOmnia

Welcome!

Hello, IntelligereOmnia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BusterD (talk) 15:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Egor Orudzhev

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Egor Orudzhev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. BusterD (talk) 15:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fare per Fermare Il Declino Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fare per Fermare Il Declino Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marta García Lopez

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marta García Lopez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 16:16, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

August 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ayman al-Zawahiri, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 01:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tuukka Taponen (racing driver)

Hello, IntelligereOmnia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tuukka Taponen (racing driver), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Freddie Slater (racing driver) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freddie Slater (racing driver) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freddie Slater (racing driver) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MSportWiki (talk) 00:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Freddie Slater is one of the greatest kart racers in history. I don't understand why Wikipedia publishes articles about obscure football players or unknown hip-hop singers, but Freddie Slater, who will be racing in Formula 1 in the next 5 years because he is one of the fastest racer in the world gets deleted. IntelligereOmnia (talk) 19:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Tuukka Taponen (racing driver) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Tuukka Taponen. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ljleppan (talk) 13:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

I have been trying to upload Tuukka Taponen page for more than 6 months. It was complicated. Hopefully, there are no more problems right now. IntelligereOmnia (talk) 19:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Writing a new article from scratch is a big task, and you've done well to get it to this point. For the record, the above message is only about the way you moved the article (by cutting and pasting), not about the move in general. And even that is something that should be easy for an admin to fix once they get around to it. Ljleppan (talk) 14:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

I only cut and pasted my own article, the one that wasn't being published. I see there is a completely new page now. All my work was done in vain. IntelligereOmnia (talk) 23:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Harbinger Motors moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Harbinger Motors, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 07:34, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Harbinger Motors has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Harbinger Motors. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 07:35, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Rocco Coronel moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rocco Coronel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mekomo (talk) 09:36, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there,

I have a problem, let me try to explain it to Wikipedia.

Let's say I plant a tree, knowing that with time it will grow higher than a house, but for the moment the tree I've just planted is only 60cm/2feet tall. My neighbour comes around and asks me: "What did you just do?" To which I answer: "I just planted a tree." To which my neighbour answers: "No, that is not a tree, trees are supposed to be taller than houses, this is too small to be a tree!" My neighbour then uproots the tree I just planted. May I ask you, how will my tree grow tall, if it is uprooted right after less than one day?

Do you see what I just did?

The same goes for my Wikipedia pages: I am sure than Rocco Coronel's page (as well of the many pages I have started) will be over 8000 words long in ten years from now, but how is it going to reach that length if it gets erased two hours after its creation? Can you explain me why Wikipedia doesn't give time to pages to grow?

Is my page going to be deleted permanently or simply temporarily? If it is only temporarily deleted, when will it be acceptable enough to be reinstated?

Thank you in advance for your answer. IntelligereOmnia (talk) 15:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Came across this and figured that I'd reply since OP hasn't yet, and it might sound better coming from another feeder series editor.

Wikipedia is not a database or an indiscriminate collection of information. There are strict notability guidelines—as laid out by the general notability guideline (GNG)—that is required to be met for all pages. Most of the time, there has to be at least 3 independent, reliable, and secondary sources available for someone to qualify for an article. Since Rocco Coronel does not, it was moved back to draftspace.

Draftspace is not a deletion. It is just a temporary area for editors to work on the article until it is improved to meet the necessary quality for mainspace; in this case, until it meets GNG. You are more than welcome to keep working on it, but it can't go back to being an article unless it proves to meet requirements. Just because he has the potential to be notable in the future, that does not mean that he is now. GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 20:34, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the clear information.

I guess that in the coming months, the article will be promoted to mainspace, when Rocco wins the championship and Red Bull pushes his notoriety. How long can the article be allowed to remain at draftspace without being deleted? IntelligereOmnia (talk) 20:41, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

There is technically no time limit for draft space, however if there are no edits within a period of 6 months, it will automatically be deleted. This could easily be avoided by just adding some more information once in a while.

I also wouldn't have too much hope for him becoming notable after Ginetta Juniors; I'm working on the draft for Draft:Ethan Jeff-Hall, and there's almost nothing about his Ginetta career. RBJT will definitely help though. GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 20:44, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

I simply compare Rocco's record with a certain Freddie Slater (the racing driver). That is another page that I started and that was "sent to draft" because, apparently, Freddie was "not famous enough" to be on Wikipedia. Knowing is karting pedigree, and knowing that Ayrton Senna once said that it is easier to become Formula 1 World Champion that karting world champion, I had the impression that Freddie deserved some recognition. In five years from now, I think I might even be proven right. I know that Rocco will do great. He will have a career more illustrious than his father's or his uncle's, whose pages have been on Wikipedia for a while now. IntelligereOmnia (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

Please stop creating articles that are already in the draftspace—which is very clearly stated at the top of the page when creating one—especially when they clearly are not ready to be published and merely serve as database entries. I have noticed you do this several times in recent months. I've been working on the DVL draft for two months. MB 2437 12:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

I didn't find any page regarding DVL, so I created one. I wasn't aware of yours. You have done a great job, congrats! IntelligereOmnia (talk) 12:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Draft pages exists

You did the same thing in January 2024 with Tuukka Taponen, and various other pages, so please keep that in mind BurningBlaze05 (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

I created pages when I did not find existing ones. Where can I see if a draft already exists? IntelligereOmnia (talk) 15:22, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

It is stated at the top of the page when creating an article. MB 2437 12:59, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Harbinger Motors

Hello, IntelligereOmnia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harbinger Motors, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harbinger Motors (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sksatsuma was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

ref 2 is a PR platform and cannot contribute to notability. More reliable sources will be required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harbinger Motors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

sk satsuma 16:12, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IntelligereOmnia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! sk satsuma 16:12, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Niklas Schaufler

Hello, IntelligereOmnia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Niklas Schaufler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Harbinger Motors

Hello, IntelligereOmnia. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Harbinger Motors".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Niklas Schaufler

Hello, IntelligereOmnia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Niklas Schaufler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:48, 18 May 2026 (UTC)