- I've made 20,000+ edits since 2003. Comment accordingly.
Discussion at WP:ANI in which you are involved
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Content dispute at Shubhanshu Shukla involving numerous accounts/IPs and edit-war. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 15:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Bare URLs as citations
Please do not use bare URLs as citations, as at Comac C909. They are unhelpful to readers and are subject to link rot. Please use templates like Template:Cite web instead. Danners430 tweaks made 05:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Two minutes after you wasted your time complaining, Citationbot formatted the bare URL. Which is why I leave this kind of thing to automation when using sources the bots handle fine. Asamboi (talk) 07:28, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- If you read the edit summary, it was fixed because I told Citation Bot to run - there is no automated system that automatically fixes bare URLs, it requires another editor to notice them and poke a bot.
- And please don't be so rude… "wasting your time complaining" - I left a civil note about a concern, so please be civil in return. Danners430 tweaks made 14:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Came here to say this too. I feel like we’ve had a good working relationship the last couple of weeks, so I hope you’ll take this in the spirit of collaboration that I intend it. While Wikipedia does have automated systems to fill out bare references, they’re not as good as a human editor like you or I could be. I’d highly recommend using a semi automated tool like ProveIt if you’re a source editor, or using the built in automated reference tool if you use VisualEditor. RickyCourtney (talk) 14:45, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- I edit a lot on mobile where tool access is limited. I do hit up ReFill if I'm adding many sources, but at the end of the day this is (IMHO) a deficiency in MediaWiki. Asamboi (talk) 19:47, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Try using the visual editor. Its automated reference generator is really very good. RickyCourtney (talk) 20:16, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- The Visual Editor isn’t available on mobile. You do have to manually create the citation… however, in my opinion it isn’t really that difficult to quickly type out
{{cite web |url=example.com |title=This is a citation |author=Joe Bloggs |date=1 April 2025 |access-date=15 July 2025}}. - There is always a tool like Citr which could be used - access using a mobile browser, and copy the generated named reference into the article source. Danners430 tweaks made 20:47, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- The Visual Editor is very much available on mobile. RickyCourtney (talk) 21:06, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- If you’re using a mobile browser yes - I’m assuming they mean they use the app, and unless I’m missing something I can’t find the visual editor in the app. Personally I just use a browser in desktop mode… Danners430 tweaks made 22:04, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- The Visual Editor is very much available on mobile. RickyCourtney (talk) 21:06, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- The Visual Editor isn’t available on mobile. You do have to manually create the citation… however, in my opinion it isn’t really that difficult to quickly type out
- Try using the visual editor. Its automated reference generator is really very good. RickyCourtney (talk) 20:16, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- I edit a lot on mobile where tool access is limited. I do hit up ReFill if I'm adding many sources, but at the end of the day this is (IMHO) a deficiency in MediaWiki. Asamboi (talk) 19:47, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
SPI section
Special:Diff/1300019036: You should move the comment to "Comments by other users" section. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 22:02, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
Using rollback like this requires an edit summary, see point six at WP:ROLLBACKUSE. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Reverting content deletion by IPs falls under point one. As you can see from the page's history, the article has an extensive track record of edit warring. Asamboi (talk) 22:58, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- IP editors should get the same treatment as other editors, and have the same good faith assumptions made about their editing. Point one is for
"obvious vandalism"
, that was not obvious vandalism, they even provided rationale in their edit summary. I'm very familiar with the article's history. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 23:33, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- IP editors should get the same treatment as other editors, and have the same good faith assumptions made about their editing. Point one is for
A cup of tea for you!
 |
Sorry for my ignorance in considering you as Assamese. Now I get it what is Asam boi all thanks to you. Manav2311 (talk) 10:34, 26 July 2025 (UTC) |
Josh Cahill Press Release
Hey! Where does it say that the Press Release was published by the subject or his team? Everyone can pay for these dubious press release and make it look like something official. Would be nice if you could back up your editing as it seems very misleading and false. 79.255.14.198 (talk) 14:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- The article doesn't claim Josh published it, it just says the PR was published by an agency. The contents of the PR are pretty much just a translation of the airliners.de interview though. Asamboi (talk) 22:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- How is this relevant though and why are you refusing to add reliable sources of the Australian and Focus which refer to him as Melbourne born and Australian, is there a reason? 79.255.14.198 (talk) 08:25, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- → Talk:Josh Cahill. Asamboi (talk) 09:49, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- How is this relevant though and why are you refusing to add reliable sources of the Australian and Focus which refer to him as Melbourne born and Australian, is there a reason? 79.255.14.198 (talk) 08:25, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Please stop judging a book by its cover
If you're going to revert an edit with a mix of positive and negative parts, you need to carefully check that you remove only the illegitimate content and that you're keeping or building on any legitimate content. I've undone your revert except that I kept the unrelated reference removed. I hope you do realize that this behavior is not specific to Wikipedia and that you have done the same thing on Wikivoyage as well. You holding admin rights on Wikivoyage doesn't convince me either. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) Tamil speakers: Contribute here 23:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) Tamil speakers: Contribute here 00:19, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for cross-wiki harassment. Asamboi (talk) 23:37, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Help for discussing AfD of Feraliminal Lycanthropizer (Woodard related)
Hi, I nominated the article Feraliminal Lycanthropizer for deletion. As you have taken part in the discussion around the David Woodard exploits, I thought you might provide insights in that discussion as well. Regards, 1904.CC (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Striking
Your striking here is frivolous. That RfC has nothing to do with any military, let alone Indian military history (which predates even the birth of this person). Even if your argument is accepted, then still, striking is carried out only when the comment was made while evading a ban. Koshuri Sultan is not doing that. Now go and read WP:TBAN to understand how it works. Orientls (talk) 14:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:24, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Asamboi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
In an AN discussion, administrator Daniel Case explicitly asked me, and I quote, I would really like to see Asamboi elaborate on the concerns raised here
, where the concern was sockpuppetry in the RFC. I responded with two SPI-confirmed sockpuppets and a link to an inconclusive SPI I had initiated earlier.
- This is my first block in 22 years of editing Wikipedia. Can you please clarify what part of my response constitutes a personal attack, and how should I have responded to this direct question?
- Also @Daniel Case: in case I somehow misunderstood what you were asking for. Asamboi (talk) 21:22, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Declining this unblock request as moot since the block expired before any admin could review it. I'm sorry nobody accepted or declined this request before that happened. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:37, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You understood correcttly; don’t worry. But it seems from the comments below there was another side to the story, and thus it appears to me you have been properly blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 06:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm still genuinely not getting it. You asked to me elaborate on my concerns of sockpuppetry, I did so by linking to two confirmed socks & and an inconclusive SPI. How else should I have answered the question? Asamboi (talk) 09:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- The way you did. My request has nothing to do with why you got blocked beyond the way you choose to phrase your response. Daniel Case (talk) 12:45, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm still genuinely not getting it. You asked to me elaborate on my concerns of sockpuppetry, I did so by linking to two confirmed socks & and an inconclusive SPI. How else should I have answered the question? Asamboi (talk) 09:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- You understood correcttly; don’t worry. But it seems from the comments below there was another side to the story, and thus it appears to me you have been properly blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 06:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
This SPI was not "inconclusive" but conclusively established that no sockpuppetry was happening.
You were not just clarifying your "concerns" on this message, but you were endorsing your SPI and refuted allegations by saying "Some other users in the debate are also IMHO extremely likely to be sock/meatpuppets and you're invited to draw your own conclusions
," despite negative results. It is upsetting that you still don't understand how you were violating WP:NPA. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 04:11, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- To be fair, an SPI, with or without Checkuser being used, can never “conclusively establish” that no sockpuppetry is occurring. It can just suggest there’s no reasonable basis to believe that there is. A persistently inventive and knowledgeable user could find a number of ways to make it appear they are, in fact, two or three different people, far more than any means we could test for. For that reason we do not allow the use of Checkuser to “prove innocence”, unlike some other Wikipedias. Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- I accept that the SPI did not identify any particular users as being current sockmasters, and it was not my intention to imply that they are. However, I stand by the evidence of unusual editing I provided in the SPI, which, to quote the endorsing clerk,
is such a bizarre thing to edit war over, so obviously undue in a single-paragraph biography lead, that I'm really struggling to imagine a situation in which at least three unrelated people would try to force it in
. Asamboi (talk) 12:13, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- I accept that the SPI did not identify any particular users as being current sockmasters, and it was not my intention to imply that they are. However, I stand by the evidence of unusual editing I provided in the SPI, which, to quote the endorsing clerk,
DYK for Tusker (Vanuatu beer)
On 7 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tusker (Vanuatu beer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Vanuatu beer Tusker is named after the tusks of a pig, a traditional symbol of wealth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tusker (Vanuatu beer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tusker (Vanuatu beer)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for Gulhifalhu
On 24 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gulhifalhu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gulhifalhu, previously uninhabitable, is now described by the Maldives Independent as "engineered for urban disaster"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gulhifalhu. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gulhifalhu), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 14,076 views (1,173.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2025 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:30, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Deletion review for Emirates SkyCargo Flight 9788
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Emirates SkyCargo Flight 9788. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. XYZ1233212 (talk) 09:19, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prince Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Prince Group
Hello! Your submission of Prince Group at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:23, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Zizians
Even though the RFC hasn't been closed, it has expired and the outcome seems to be very clear so you can change it to "mostly" or "predominantly". This was the longstanding version anyway before someone changed it to "some" ~2025-33690-00 (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
HSR station
Hello @Asamboi: Please participate on the Talk:Karawang railway station, regards. ~2025-40306-41 (talk) 01:06, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Asamboi!
Asamboi,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ☎ 11:00, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
DYK for Bethke brothers
On 19 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bethke brothers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the three Bethke brothers separately escaped from East Germany using an air mattress, a zip line and ultralight aircraft? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bethke brothers. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bethke brothers), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 8,000 views (666.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2026 – nice work! |
March 2026
Hello, I'm Pasados. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hindon Airport have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pasados (talk) 10:28, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Pasados: Huh? FlyBig ceased operations in 2023 and formally declared bankruptcy in 2025. Asamboi (talk) 10:35, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Asamboi Don’t add anything as a comment; always cite reliable source. Pasados (talk) 10:40, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
- MOS:LEADCITE. The flights were already removed from the list of airlines and destinations. Asamboi (talk) 11:16, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
- That information should be included in the relevant section of the article, not in the lead, because the lead is not for WP:NOTNEWS. Pasados (talk) 11:25, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
- MOS:LEADCITE. The flights were already removed from the list of airlines and destinations. Asamboi (talk) 11:16, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Asamboi I was about to leave a {{uw-bareurl}} template here when I noticed your most recent edit, but spotted this thread so I’ll post here instead. Please don’t post bare URLs and use properly structured citations where possible. Danners430 tweaks made 11:28, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
- → Wikipedia:Bare_URLs#What_is_right_with_bare_URLs? Asamboi (talk) 11:33, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not removing it because it's a valid source. However I'm asking you nicely to please use full citations going forward - yes you satisfy what you've linked, but "What's wrong with bare URLs" still applies Danners430 tweaks made 11:38, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Asamboi it's been over 11 months since I first made you aware of the problems with bare URLs, yet you continue to add them. It takes seconds of extra effort to format citations properly instead of unhelpful bare URLs. Please stop expecting other editors to clean up after you. Danners430 tweaks made 13:00, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- → Wikipedia:Bare_URLs#What_is_right_with_bare_URLs? Asamboi (talk) 11:33, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Asamboi Don’t add anything as a comment; always cite reliable source. Pasados (talk) 10:40, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
Waymo vehicles
I just added the table in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waymo#Vehicles and then I saw your comment on the talk page requesting something like this. Maybe you can have a look and maybe improve upon it.
Also, as I just read through your talk page and the "bare URLs" controversies, I can relate to the principle of making a small improvement by providing the link, instead of making a mental note to do a perfect cite ref edit some time later... The latter is one of the reasons for me having contributed so little lately. Robert Will (talk) 14:55, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Revert of GallopAir
Your revert of GallopAir states "the airline has not commenced operations in any meaningful sense yet" and it removed the Commenced operations date from the infobox. If that is true, then the following excerpted text, with a valid reference, should be removed from the article, because it contradicts that statement.
"GallopAir flew its first flight on 31 December 2024, from Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport to Brunei International Airport, with a Comac C909 chartered from China Southern Airlines.[1]"
Would you please remove the above text, since it is incorrect and misleading. Or, if it is not incorrect, then would you please undo your revert and leave the above text in the article.
One or the other must be done. It is an intrinsic violation of Wikipedia policy and guidelines to have contradictory information. that does nothing but confuse our readers.
Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2026 (UTC) Truthanado (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Thanks at Finnish cuisine
Thanks for the source, particularly after my own efforts were unsuccessful to that end, and bitterness was exactly the type of descriptor I was after. Whonting (talk) 23:34, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Internal Security Act (Singapore)
Internal Security Act (Singapore) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:10, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
DYK for Boracay Bridge
On 17 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Boracay Bridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a contract for building the Boracay Bridge was awarded despite opposition from the local municipality, the Ati people, and the Archbishop of Capiz? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boracay Bridge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Boracay Bridge), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
You may be eligible to vote in the U4C election
I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.
-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk)
Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
(This message was sent to User talk:Jpatokal and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
Misinformation caused by you
You recently removed a photo posted by the ministry of transportation in egypt, on cairo monorail, first of all you’re not even a resident in cairo, the picture you added is unofficial and provides WRONG names for the stations, its a proposal from 2023!!! On the upcoming project, you went ahead and removed an official photo posted by the ministry on the monorail network line and replaced it with a photo that is over 3 years old and the government changed the names of these stations LONG TIME AGO!! Ahmed.zahran26 (talk) 22:52, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has very strict copyright policies, and we cannot use official images like maps unless they are in the public domain or explicitly Creative Commons licensed. See Licensing for an overview.
- The current map is the best we have. If it has problems, you can edit it yourself to fix them, and upload a new version! Asamboi (talk) 23:40, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
Listing flights for astronauts
For the page on Lai Ka-ying you already have the mission listed in the infobox. Per the Template:Infobox astronaut instructions we list: Completed or in-progress space mission or missions in which the person has taken or is taking part. Do not enter future missions: crew assignments can change prior to launch. RickyCourtney (talk) 13:51, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
DYK for Lai Ka-ying
On 20 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lai Ka-ying, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lai Ka-ying is the first Hongkonger in space, but not the first astronaut born in Hong Kong? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lai Ka-ying. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lai Ka-ying), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
Dirty rum
"[A] dirty rum is a spiced rum." Do you have a reliable source for that; maybe I will add a mention to the article if you do. If not, is there any place online showing it as the common usage? Not finding anything in search results for that meaning on my end (and have no familiarity with it personally). — Godsy (TALKCONT) 10:26, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- The only article currently linking to Dirty rum, namely Goombay Punch, is definitely using it in the sense of a spiced rum. This usage seems kind of antiquated though. Asamboi (talk) 10:29, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- I see it at Goombay Smash. Seems to be described at Difford's Guide Goombay Smash and most the other references I find are in regard to this cocktail. Difford's puts it in quotes; maybe it is a one-off term in relation to this particular recipe? — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:05, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- Unlikely, since "dirty rum and coke" is definitely a thing.
- My bigger problem with both redirect targets is that neither mentions the concept at all. We should probably add something to both: that a "dirty rum" is an ambiguous term that can refer to dark or spiced rums, and a "dirty rum and coke" is made with dark/spiced rum instead of the usual light rum. Asamboi (talk) 02:16, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- True, but that's a different kind of dirty
, i.e. with rum & coke with lime and coconut liquor or syrup. Given recent developments, my first thought would have been cream. Even if content were added to both, which would be primary? Might be a case for RfD (perhaps a return to red). — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:13, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- True, but that's a different kind of dirty
- I see it at Goombay Smash. Seems to be described at Difford's Guide Goombay Smash and most the other references I find are in regard to this cocktail. Difford's puts it in quotes; maybe it is a one-off term in relation to this particular recipe? — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:05, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
Good photo request scheme
Hello, thank you for providing numerous photos across Southeast Asia. Since I found out that there are so many photos that are bad quality, or old, or just doesn't exist, therefore I created Good photo requested scheme to list out the photos required. I would like to invite you to participate, try to eliminate such blackhole of photos, especially in Southeast Asia. Would you mind to? Thank you! owennson (Meeting Room、Certificates) 15:15, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- How does this differ from Wikipedia:Requested pictures? Also, freedom of panorama is a major limitation in many SE Asian countries, Commons will not accept photos of modern structures in eg Laos. Asamboi (talk) 20:13, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to hear about freedom of panorama is unusable in many countries. This is more of a supplement of RP. owennson (Meeting Room、Certificates) 23:23, 1 July 2026 (UTC)