NCFI GAN
Hi there! I recognize that this timing is probably improbable seeming, but I wanted to let you know I do have (what I hope is) a pretty comprehensive review typed up that I was just about to post to that GAN. I ended up having to track down some offline sources to see what was up with them, and realized after taking on the review that I have some concerns about the broadness that I've been struggling to articulate. If you'd like to take on the main role in reviewing, that's fine with me, especially because I know I've been quite slow at doing this, but I wanted to let you know in case my commentary would still be helpful there. NovaHyperiontalk 06:20, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- @NovaHyperion: Hey! I don't mind how you were summoned, but I'm glad to hear from you :) I responded on the review so that the train would stay on the tracks for the nominator, but left the door open for you. I'm happy for you to share your feedback and drive it as the main reviewer! Let me know how I can support Matthew Yeager (talk) 06:27, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- That's fair, I recognize I got behind on this review. I do appreciate your feedback thus far, thanks for the guidance as I do my best to figure out the GA process :) I know I can work slow, which is probably not ideal for a time-limited drive, but I'll definitely learn from this and try to keep improving. NovaHyperiontalk 07:40, 14 June 2026 (UTC)